Understanding the Impact of Lead Length on Capacitance Measurements

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Darren93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of lead length and arrangement on capacitance measurements using an LCR meter. Participants explore the discrepancies observed in capacitance values when leads are configured in different shapes, specifically comparing parallel and circular setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports measuring a capacitance of 3pF in a parallel setup and 26pF in a circular setup, expressing confusion over the significant difference.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the circular setup, suggesting that the leads being farther apart should result in lower capacitance, indicating a possible measurement error.
  • A participant clarifies that the circular setup refers to a single loop of wire and expresses uncertainty about the cause of the observed capacitance values.
  • One participant proposes that the increased inductance of the wires might be misinterpreted as capacitance, questioning the theoretical basis for higher capacitance in a circular configuration.
  • Another participant suggests that closing the loop may enhance magnetic field interactions, potentially affecting energy storage and capacitance.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of the meter readings, with one participant attributing the discrepancies to possible false readings due to inductance effects.
  • A participant speculates that noise at 50/60Hz might be coupling into the circular arrangement, complicating the capacitance measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and confusion regarding the measurements, with no consensus on the reasons behind the observed capacitance values. Multiple competing explanations are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that capacitance measurements of small values should ideally be made with short leads, and the unconnected capacitance should be accounted for in the final readings. There is also mention of potential measurement errors and the influence of inductance and noise on the results.

Darren93
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm looking at an experiment at the moment whereby I'm using an LCR meter to measure capacitance. However the effect of leads seems to be quite profound. Connecting up 50cm leads in a parallel setup has a capacitance of about 3pF and in a circle setup about 26pF. What causes such a capacitance and why does varying the shape cause a change in this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is a "circular setup"? It SOUNDS like something where the wires would be farther apart than in a parallel setup, so if that's the case then you must have made an error in your measurements since the capacitance should be dramatically less if you move the leads away from each other.
 
That's what I would of thought. I checked several times and that's the readings the meter indicated. By a circle I mean a single loop where we just pulled apart the leads to form a circle. I have no idea what's going on to cause such a change. Could it be that there is a larger inductance of the wires that the reader is mistaking as a capacitance? Or is there any theoretical rational for why a circular wire would have a higher capacitance?
 
Hm ... I don't get it either.
 
I am quite interested in how this experiment was set up.

It could be that as you close the loop, the magnetic fields interact better to store energy.

C= \frac {A \varepsilon}{d}

As the distance, d, gets smaller, the capacitance, C, gets larger.
 
Plant_Boy said:
As the distance, d, gets smaller, the capacitance, C, gets larger.
Yes, that's the point. He is getting the OPPOSITE result which neither of us find reasonable.
 
Oh, Are we about to go into Lorentz forces here...? O_o
 
As long as I know now there is no real theoretical explanation as to why that would happen I can blame the meter readings giving off false readings. I'm pretty sure it is due to the inductance being larger, and as the meter works of determining phase shift from input to output it could cause problems with the capacitance measurments.
 
I'm guessing it's 50/60Hz noise coupling into the circular arrangement and confusing the meter. Capacitance measurements of small value capacitances should be made with as short a length of leads as possible, and the unconnected capacitance reading should be subtracted from the measured value. I have leads about 5cm long on my hand-held LCR meter, and its unconnected reading is 0.28pF.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K