Understanding the Motion: Free Body Diagram of Ruler Pulling to the Right

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stalker23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Free body
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a wheel system, specifically why a large wheel spins counterclockwise when a ruler is pulled to the right. Participants argue that free body diagrams are not applicable, as the motion is governed by the interconnectivity of the machinery rather than individual forces. The focus shifts to the speed of the wheel rims and the relationship between the smaller wheels and the larger wheel. It is suggested that understanding the motion can be simplified by visualizing the wheels as cogs with uniform spacing. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of the system over traditional force analysis.
Stalker23
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Anyone know why the big wheele spins counter clockwise in thsi video?

Can anyone draw me a free body diagram of what's going on when the ruler is pulled to the right?



thankyou
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Stalker23! :smile:

Free body diagrams are irrelevant, this isn't a forces problem at all, it's a piece of machinery in which moving one part automatically moves all the other parts.

Concentrate on the speed of the rims of the wheels (and remember that the cotton-reel has two rims, one in contact with the table, and one with half the diameter in contact with the big wheel). :wink:
 
hmmm. well what i can't figure out is why the wheel spins the opposite direction. The way i was gunna prove this to myself was through a free body diagram. but when i draw it the forces i get don't make sense. Just considering hte forces between the ruler and the big wheele, i get the frictional force on the wheele to point to the right...meaning the wheele should spin to the right?

allthough if i look at the bottom two wheels, there frictional force is to the right, but causes a pos moment about the center of the big wheel. I guess those forces are larger than those between the ruler and the wheele?
 
Forget forces. Forget friction.

Imagine the wheels are cogs, with the same distance between teeth on all wheels.

When the cart moves at speed v, what is the speed of the teeth on the big wheel?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top