Understanding the Physics of the Collapse of WTC Towers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Illuminist14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collapse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics behind the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers, specifically addressing the misconception that the lower sections of the towers should have arrested the falling upper sections. Participants clarify that an object accelerating downward exerts less force on the structure below, which contributed to the total collapse rather than a stopping effect. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding gravitational forces and structural failure in the context of the WTC disaster.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of structural engineering principles
  • Awareness of the NIST WTC investigation reports
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's laws of motion in detail
  • Research gravitational acceleration and its effects on structures
  • Examine structural engineering case studies related to building collapses
  • Review the NIST final reports on the WTC collapse for in-depth analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, structural engineers, disaster response professionals, and anyone interested in the scientific analysis of building failures.

Illuminist14
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Collapse of WTC towers...

Hi all,

I am a Layman in physics unfortunately, this is my first post so be kind please.

I Know that an object accelerating downward exerts less force on the part below than if it were being held in place, But how does this relate to the top section of the WTC falling on the below section? Some people say because of that statement, the second lower section should arrest the falling upper section. I do not think that should happen though, as it did not in reality.

Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Undergrad Chimney vs building demolition physics
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Graduate Professor Jones' claims about the physics of WTC collapse
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Drawbridge falling before caught by rope/cable - Max force
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Undergrad Two objects, one accelerating downwards onto another
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Modeling the damping of a physical rigid pendulum
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School What happens to buoyancy when a non-uniform force is applied to the liquid?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Incorrect Physics in Furious 7 Car Tower Scene
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Building Collapses: Examining the Physics and Symmetry of the Twin Towers
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Graduate An odd question regarding Bernoulli's Principle
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Graduate Questions about the formula P = rho*g*h
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
27K