Understanding the Power of a t-Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mogarrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power T-test
Mogarrr
Messages
120
Reaction score
6
I'm looking over my notes, and I'm puzzled by this non-central t-distribution, and why it is the alternative hypothesis.

Non-central t-distribution: If X \sim (\delta, 1) and Y \sim \chi^2_{r}, in addition if X and Y are independent random variables, then \frac {X}{\sqrt{\frac {Y}{r}}} has a t-distribution with non-centrality parameter, \delta

\frac {\frac {\bar{X} - \mu}{\frac {\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}}{\sqrt{\frac {(n-1)s^2}{\sigma^2 (n-1)}}} = \frac {\bar{X} - \mu_0}{\frac {s}{\sqrt{n}}} \sim t_{\delta = \frac {\bar{X} - \mu}{\frac {\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}}

H_0 : \mu = \mu_0, H_1 : \mu \neq \mu_0

1 - \beta = P(\frac {|\bar{X} - \mu_0|}{\frac {s}{\sqrt{n}}} > t_{1 - \frac {\alpha}2} | \delta = \frac {\mu - \mu_0}{\frac {\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}, n-1)


I do see that the general form for the power of a test is P{null is rejected | alternative is true}, but why is it that the alternative hypothesis is this crazy looking distribution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The noncentral t distribution arises as you are testing a special alternative, namely that X is distributed normally around delta, and not around 0 as in the null hypothesis.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top