Understanding the Relationship between Connection and Metric in Curved Spacetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter gnieddu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection Metric
gnieddu
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I'm struggling to grasp the physical reason behind the fact that, in a curved spacetime, a change of metric implies, in general, a change of connection, i.e. if I have two metrics g_{ab} and \hat{g}_{ab}, in general \nabla_a \neq \hat{\nabla}_a.

Besides this, is there any relationship between the two connections? In other words, if I know \nabla_aT for a given tensor T, is there a general formula which converts it into \hat{\nabla}_aT?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't such a thing as "the" connection. There are many possible connections. In general relativity, the connection is chosen to be the Levi-Civita connection, which is defined by the metric.
 
gnieddu said:
Hi,

I'm struggling to grasp the physical reason behind the fact that, in a curved spacetime, a change of metric implies, in general, a change of connection, i.e. if I have two metrics g_{ab} and \hat{g}_{ab}, in general \nabla_a \neq \hat{\nabla}_a.

Imagine stretching a surface embedded in Euclidean space in a non-uniform way. This is a change of the induced metric on the surface, and you can see that parallel transported vectors on the original surface are no longer parallel transported. This is why the connection changes when the metric is changed. Another way to see it is to imagine taking a flat surface with straight lines drawn on it, and then stretching it over a sphere. There are many ways to do this, and in generel, the straight lines need not become great circles on the sphere, i.e. they are no longer geodesics with the new induced metric. Since the set of geodesics determine the connection, and since geodesics are not preserved by changes of metric, the connection must change.

gnieddu said:
Besides this, is there any relationship between the two connections? In other words, if I know \nabla_aT for a given tensor T, is there a general formula which converts it into \hat{\nabla}_aT?

Thanks

You simply have to re-calculate the Christoffel symbols with the new metric.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top