Understanding the Simplicity of Pole at z=+i for h(z)

  • Thread starter Thread starter billiards
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pole
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding why the pole at z=+i for the function h(z) = 1/(1+z²) is classified as simple. Participants explore the nature of the function and its representation through series expansions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to develop a Laurent series around the point z=i and question how to express the function in the appropriate form. There are attempts to use Taylor series and partial fraction decomposition, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their reasoning and the implications of their findings.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with several participants providing guidance on how to approach the series expansion. There is recognition of the need to express terms correctly and explore the implications of different series forms. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being examined, particularly regarding the nature of the pole.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly identifying the form of the series and the implications of terms contributing to the Laurent series. There is also mention of the challenge in expanding certain terms and the potential confusion arising from different series representations.

billiards
Messages
765
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement



Why is the pole at [itex]z=+i[/itex] simple for the function [itex]1/(1+z^{2})[/itex]?

Homework Equations



The function can be written as:
[itex]h(z)=1/(1+z^{2})=1/[(z-i)(z+i)][/itex]

It can be expanded as a Laurent series:
[itex]h(z)=\sum^{\infty}_{-\infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}[/itex]

The function is defined as "simple" if terms for [itex]n<-1[/itex] do not contribute to the Laurent series. That is:
[itex]h(z)=\sum^{\infty}_{-1}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Been struggling with this one for a few days now. Tried to do a Taylor series expansion of the function but ended up with something like:

[itex]h(z)=1-2z/(1+z^{2})^{2}+...[/itex]

So it looks like z has exponents less than -1, which to my simplistic mind suggests like the Laurent series has terms contributing for n<-1. This suggests to me that there is a problem in my understanding somewhere along the line.

My intuition is telling me to take a different tack, I think the solution will probably have something to do with the fact that we are showing that the pole at +i is simple. So perhaps I can then sub [itex]z_{0}=i[/itex]?

In which case:
[itex]h(z)=\sum^{\infty}_{-\infty}a_{n}(z-i)^{n}=\frac{1}{(z-i)(z+i)}[/itex]

Hmmm.. (I literally just thought of this as typing) .. is this moving in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need to develop a Laurent series around a certain point. So here you must find the Laurent series around i. This means you must be able to write your function in the form

[tex]f(z)=...+\frac{a_{-2}}{(z-i)^2}+\frac{a_{-1}}{z-i}+a_0+a_1(z-i)+a_2(z-i)^2+...[/tex]

So, you must write your function [itex]f(z)=\frac{1}{1+z^2}[/itex] in this form. To do this, you must start with splitting your function into partial fractions...
 
micromass said:
You will need to develop a Laurent series around a certain point. So here you must find the Laurent series around i. This means you must be able to write your function in the form

[tex]f(z)=...+\frac{a_{-2}}{(z-i)^2}+\frac{a_{-1}}{z-i}+a_0+a_1(z-i)+a_2(z-i)^2+...[/tex]

So, you must write your function [itex]f(z)=\frac{1}{1+z^2}[/itex] in this form. To do this, you must start with splitting your function into partial fractions...

How do you go about expanding that function into partial fractions?
 
billiards said:
How do you go about expanding that function into partial fractions?

You'll need to find constants A and B such that

[tex]\frac{1}{z^2+1}=\frac{A}{z+i}+\frac{B}{z-i}[/tex]

Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fractions for some nice examples!
 
micromass said:
You'll need to find constants A and B such that

[tex]\frac{1}{z^2+1}=\frac{A}{z+i}+\frac{B}{z-i}[/tex]

Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fractions for some nice examples!

Thank you kind sir.

I believe the partial fraction expansion looks like this:

[itex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}-\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/itex]


Ah yes and if we observe that [itex]z+i=(z-i)+2i[/itex] then... urrrr ... how do we clean up that [itex]z+i[/itex] term? (I think my brain is not working today!)



Do we just ignore the [itex]z+i[/itex] term and note that the exponent of the [itex]z-i[/itex] is [itex]-1[/itex]?

Or can we say
 
billiards said:
Thank you kind sir.

I believe the partial fraction expansion looks like this:

[itex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}-\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/itex]

Seems good, and you probably notices that

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}[/tex]

is in the correct form, but the other term is not. You will have to write the term

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in a series that involves only terms of the kind [itex](z-i)[/itex]. For this, we will have to use the following very well known series

[tex]\frac{1}{1-z}=1+z+z^2+z^3+z^4+...[/tex]

Can you use the above series to write

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in the form of a series?
 
micromass said:
Seems good, and you probably notices that

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}[/tex]

is in the correct form, but the other term is not. You will have to write the term

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in a series that involves only terms of the kind [itex](z-i)[/itex]. For this, we will have to use the following very well known series

[tex]\frac{1}{1-z}=1+z+z^2+z^3+z^4+...[/tex]

Can you use the above series to write

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in the form of a series?

Hmmm I can't see how to do it that way.

I tried a Taylor series expansion about z=i of that expression and I think it is wrong but I found that...

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}=-\frac{1}{4}-\frac{i}{8}(z-i)-\frac{1}{4}(z-i)^{2}+...[/tex]

Now that fits, but I don't fully understand my own reasoning for getting there so I don't feel comfortable. Also I would like to see how using the well know series works.

Cheers
 
For the well-known series approach, do

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}=\frac{1}{2iz-2}=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{1-zi}[/tex]

Now apply the well-known series

[tex]\frac{1}{1-a}=1+a+a^2+a^3+a^4+...[/tex]

with a=zi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K