Understanding the Simplicity of Pole at z=+i for h(z)

  • Thread starter Thread starter billiards
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pole
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
billiards
Messages
765
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement



Why is the pole at [itex]z=+i[/itex] simple for the function [itex]1/(1+z^{2})[/itex]?

Homework Equations



The function can be written as:
[itex]h(z)=1/(1+z^{2})=1/[(z-i)(z+i)][/itex]

It can be expanded as a Laurent series:
[itex]h(z)=\sum^{\infty}_{-\infty}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}[/itex]

The function is defined as "simple" if terms for [itex]n<-1[/itex] do not contribute to the Laurent series. That is:
[itex]h(z)=\sum^{\infty}_{-1}a_{n}(z-z_{0})^{n}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Been struggling with this one for a few days now. Tried to do a Taylor series expansion of the function but ended up with something like:

[itex]h(z)=1-2z/(1+z^{2})^{2}+...[/itex]

So it looks like z has exponents less than -1, which to my simplistic mind suggests like the Laurent series has terms contributing for n<-1. This suggests to me that there is a problem in my understanding somewhere along the line.

My intuition is telling me to take a different tack, I think the solution will probably have something to do with the fact that we are showing that the pole at +i is simple. So perhaps I can then sub [itex]z_{0}=i[/itex]?

In which case:
[itex]h(z)=\sum^{\infty}_{-\infty}a_{n}(z-i)^{n}=\frac{1}{(z-i)(z+i)}[/itex]

Hmmm.. (I literally just thought of this as typing) .. is this moving in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need to develop a Laurent series around a certain point. So here you must find the Laurent series around i. This means you must be able to write your function in the form

[tex]f(z)=...+\frac{a_{-2}}{(z-i)^2}+\frac{a_{-1}}{z-i}+a_0+a_1(z-i)+a_2(z-i)^2+...[/tex]

So, you must write your function [itex]f(z)=\frac{1}{1+z^2}[/itex] in this form. To do this, you must start with splitting your function into partial fractions...
 
micromass said:
You will need to develop a Laurent series around a certain point. So here you must find the Laurent series around i. This means you must be able to write your function in the form

[tex]f(z)=...+\frac{a_{-2}}{(z-i)^2}+\frac{a_{-1}}{z-i}+a_0+a_1(z-i)+a_2(z-i)^2+...[/tex]

So, you must write your function [itex]f(z)=\frac{1}{1+z^2}[/itex] in this form. To do this, you must start with splitting your function into partial fractions...

How do you go about expanding that function into partial fractions?
 
micromass said:
You'll need to find constants A and B such that

[tex]\frac{1}{z^2+1}=\frac{A}{z+i}+\frac{B}{z-i}[/tex]

Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fractions for some nice examples!

Thank you kind sir.

I believe the partial fraction expansion looks like this:

[itex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}-\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/itex]


Ah yes and if we observe that [itex]z+i=(z-i)+2i[/itex] then... urrrr ... how do we clean up that [itex]z+i[/itex] term? (I think my brain is not working today!)



Do we just ignore the [itex]z+i[/itex] term and note that the exponent of the [itex]z-i[/itex] is [itex]-1[/itex]?

Or can we say
 
billiards said:
Thank you kind sir.

I believe the partial fraction expansion looks like this:

[itex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}-\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/itex]

Seems good, and you probably notices that

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}[/tex]

is in the correct form, but the other term is not. You will have to write the term

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in a series that involves only terms of the kind [itex](z-i)[/itex]. For this, we will have to use the following very well known series

[tex]\frac{1}{1-z}=1+z+z^2+z^3+z^4+...[/tex]

Can you use the above series to write

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in the form of a series?
 
micromass said:
Seems good, and you probably notices that

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z-i)}[/tex]

is in the correct form, but the other term is not. You will have to write the term

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in a series that involves only terms of the kind [itex](z-i)[/itex]. For this, we will have to use the following very well known series

[tex]\frac{1}{1-z}=1+z+z^2+z^3+z^4+...[/tex]

Can you use the above series to write

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}[/tex]

in the form of a series?

Hmmm I can't see how to do it that way.

I tried a Taylor series expansion about z=i of that expression and I think it is wrong but I found that...

[tex]\frac{1}{2i(z+i)}=-\frac{1}{4}-\frac{i}{8}(z-i)-\frac{1}{4}(z-i)^{2}+...[/tex]

Now that fits, but I don't fully understand my own reasoning for getting there so I don't feel comfortable. Also I would like to see how using the well know series works.

Cheers