Understanding Time Dilation in Special Relativity

timpeac
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Just out of idle curiosity - why do we talk of "time dilation" in terms of special relativity when in fact it contracts which is the opposite? Is there a reason or is it just accepted usage?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timpeac said:
Hi,

Just out of idle curiosity - why do we talk of "time dilation" in terms of special relativity when in fact it contracts which is the opposite? Is there a reason or is it just accepted usage?

What do you mean it contracts? The specific word "dilation" refers to the lengthening of physical processes. i.e in my rest frame a strobe light flashes once per second, but if I put the same strobe light on a spaceship and shoot it off at relativistic velocities, I now see it flashing only once every two seconds. The period of flashing is dilated, not contracted.
 
Nabeshin said:
What do you mean it contracts? The specific word "dilation" refers to the lengthening of physical processes. i.e in my rest frame a strobe light flashes once per second, but if I put the same strobe light on a spaceship and shoot it off at relativistic velocities, I now see it flashing only once every two seconds. The period of flashing is dilated, not contracted.

Ah yes, I see. I think it's a case of you say tomahtoes I say tomaytoes -the way I was thinking of it is that the person left on Earth considers that for every one his seconds one on the ship his lasts 0.8 (or whatever) as long and so his has contracted. Yours is of course the same view but from the other perspective - and I suppose it is more valid like that since it is the ship that has undergone the acceleration and not him after all.
 
Last edited:
Ah, I see where your confusion was coming from now. Yeah, we call it dilation because we define the time of physical processes as the time occurring in their rest frames. So whenever we observe these processes in a moving frame, they always appear to take longer. Just for clarification, the guy on the rocket ship (or whatever) sees the clocks on Earth run .8s for every one second he experiences. In that respect, the situation is completely symmetric.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top