Graduate Understanding time translations in Ballentine

  • Thread starter Thread starter EE18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of time translations in nonrelativistic mechanics, specifically referencing Ballentine's quantum mechanics text. The key point is the transformation of the wavefunction under time displacement, represented by the unitary operator ##e^{isH}##. The confusion arises from the relationship between the time translation and the resulting wavefunction, particularly why the transformation is expressed as ##|𝜓(𝑡)⟩→|𝜓(𝑡−s)⟩## instead of ##|𝜓(𝑡+s)⟩##. The distinction between active and passive transformations is also clarified, emphasizing their inverse relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions.
  • Familiarity with the concept of unitary operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation and Hamiltonians.
  • Basic grasp of nonrelativistic mechanics and the Galilean group.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of unitary transformations in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the differences between active and passive transformations in physics.
  • Learn about the role of Hamiltonians in state evolution using the Schrödinger equation.
  • Investigate the Galilean group and its significance in nonrelativistic mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and time evolution, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of time translations and transformations.

EE18
Messages
112
Reaction score
13
I suppose this question ultimately boils down to: when we speak of a time translation (in nonrelativistic mechanics, so that the Galilean group is the apporpiate symmetry group under which the physics of a system must not change) what do we mean? In particular, do we mean that the value we assign to the current moment does not matter (of course) or that if we actually actively translate the system in time, then nothing changes (how can this be true? The state may evolve in time!).

This question is motivated by the following excerpt from Ballentine's quantum text on page 77:

Corresponding to the time displacement 𝑡→𝑡′=𝑡+𝑠, there is a vector space transformation of the form (3.8) [i.e. effected by the unitary operator for time translations which was earlier seen to be ##e^{isH}## in this context],|𝜓(𝑡)⟩→##e^{isH}##|𝜓(𝑡)⟩ =(?) |𝜓(𝑡−𝑠)⟩
where it's the equality marked with (?) which I can't follow and which I think has to do with my lack of understanding of time translations. If I am doing 𝑡→𝑡′=𝑡+𝑠 on the system then shouldn't my system get mapped to |𝜓′⟩=|𝜓(𝑡′)⟩=|𝜓(𝑡+𝑠)⟩? If 𝑠>0 I am ahead in time after the active transformation, no? I think the crux of my misunderstanding is why a ##t-s##rather than ##t+s## appears in the argument of the transformed state.

This is related to my not understanding the end of Saoirse's answer here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It all boils down to equation (3.8)
$$U(\tau)\psi(x)=\psi(\tau^{-1}x).$$
Notice that transforming "forward" the wavefunctions is the same as leaving the wavefunction intact but transforming "backward" the space-time variable variables.Hence, moving forward in time, ##t \rightarrow t+s##, is given by ##\psi(t) \rightarrow\psi(t-s).##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes LittleSchwinger
EE18 said:
I think the crux of my misunderstanding is why a ##t-s##rather than ##t+s## appears in the argument of the transformed state.
Adding to andresB's answer...

Imagine a classical observer in spacetime who, at time ##t## (as given by his wristwatch) constructs a (Cartesian, say) local coordinate system, i.e., a grid marked out in space and time numbers. To get to the point on the grid where his watch would read ##t+s## he must tardis himself forward in time to where the time coordinate on the grid says "##t+s##". Alternatively, he could grab the whole grid and slide it backwards in time by an amount ##-s##.

The former is called an "active" transformation, the latter is called a "passive" transformation. In general these are usually inverses of each other.

As for complications regarding nontrivial state evolution, that can only happen we have a nontrivial Hamiltonian. We still use the Schrödinger equation (3.38) to compute what ##\Psi(t)## looks like at arbitrary times.
 
  • Like
Likes LittleSchwinger

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K