Understanding Traffic Flow Equations: Integrals and Partial Derivatives

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the simplification of traffic flow equations involving integrals and partial derivatives, specifically how to transition between different forms of the equations. The equations model the relationship between traffic density, velocity, and flow rate, with variables representing density as a function of time and distance, and velocity as a function of density. The user expresses confusion about the mathematical process required to simplify the equations and seeks clarification on the relationship between the left and right sides of the equations. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the context and definitions of the variables involved to facilitate better comprehension. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of grasping complex mathematical concepts related to traffic flow dynamics.
cmkluza
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
(Hope it's okay that I'm posting so much at the moment, I'm having quite a bit of trouble with something I'm doing)

Homework Statement


I'm having trouble with the simplification of the following equation. The answer is shown, but I can't figure out the process to get to it.
\frac{d}{dt} \int^b_a \rho (t,x)dx = \rho (t,a)v(\rho (t,a)) - \rho (t,b)v(\rho (t,b))
\int^b_a\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\rho dx = - \int^b_a\frac{\partial }{\partial x}[\rho v(\rho)]dx
\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\rho + \frac{\partial }{\partial x}[\rho v(\rho)] = 0

Homework Equations


Edit: As @SteamKing pointed out, I should probably give some information about the equation rather than just list it.

The above equation models traffic flow, namely a wave of density traveling throughout traffic from point b to a (as best I understand it). The variables are as follows:
##\rho (t,x)## = density (##\frac{cars}{distance}##) as a function of time and distance
##v (\rho )## = velocity (##\frac{distance}{time}##) as a function of density
##Q = \rho \times v## = Flow rate (##\frac{cars}{time}##)

I've asked about the concept behind this equation in a previous thread located here which should elaborate on some questions you might have about it.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not entirely certain where to start. I've stared at this for quite some time, but I don't understand it. Are the left and right sides of the equation preserved from the first to the second step? I can see that the derivative with respect to time of the first bit becomes a partial with respect to time, though I can't necessarily understand that, but I don't see how the right side is combined and also becomes an integral with a partial inside of it. Sorry to post this without any real work, but I don't know what else to do at the moment since I have no one to explain this to me. If this silly explanation of my lack of understanding doesn't count as an attempt of course I'll remove this post.

Anyhow, thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of things in your post which aren't clear.

What is ρ(t,x) supposed to be? What is v(ρ) supposed to be?

You assume that these integrals exist in a vacuum. They do not. They describe something or some process, and it's difficult to help you without some context.

Ahh. I see now.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/on-a-conceptual-level-whats-happening-in-this-equation.856291/

You should have at least quoted the thread above so that someone would know what your equations are describing.
 
SteamKing said:
There are a couple of things in your post which aren't clear.

What is ρ(t,x) supposed to be? What is v(ρ) supposed to be?

You assume that these integrals exist in a vacuum. They do not. They describe something or some process, and it's difficult to help you without some context.

Ahh. I see now.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/on-a-conceptual-level-whats-happening-in-this-equation.856291/

You should have at least quoted the thread above so that someone would know what your equations are describing.
Sorry, I didn't realize that the values these variables represented had much of an impact on how you would evaluate this function. I'll clarify that in the original post now. Thanks!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K