Understanding Transient Analysis and the Role of Velocity's Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikealvarado100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
Transient analysis in fluid dynamics involves changes in momentum due to variations in velocity, which is a vector quantity. Discussions highlight that while changing the magnitude of velocity can create transients, altering the direction alone does not necessarily produce water hammer, as it does not result in a sudden change in flow. Water hammer occurs when there is a significant change in velocity, not merely when it becomes zero or increases from zero. Continuous flow around bends does not generate transient forces, as the flow remains constant. However, abrupt changes in flow direction or closure of valves can lead to transient forces, illustrating the complexity of fluid dynamics in practical scenarios.
Mikealvarado100
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi
Transient is result of changing in momentum and momentum is result of changing in velocity. Velocity is a vector parameter. It means that Velocity's change is due to changing in velocity's quantity or velocity's direction. All discussions about transient Analysis speak about Transient as result of changing in AMOUNT of velocity not changing in DIRECTION of it.
Assume a pipe with no operations or branches, valves or ... but there is a Tee along the pipe. Changing in velocity's direction makes momentum and therefore it makes a transient. Am I right or I make mistake and Transient is due to JUST velocity's quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Changing a direction is the same as changing an amount if you work in vectors. For piping it is easy since the flow is 1-dimensional: a change in direction changes the velocity from x to -x; a change in speed of 2x.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
Mike.. You are correct.

You have acceleration if either the magnitude or direction component of velocity changes.

However your question is about water hammer... let's say you have a pipe with a 90 degree bend in it. As water flows around the bend it accelerates (because the direction changes). This does not cause a transient force (hammer) because the water is constantly flowing. A constant acceleration means a constant force. You only get a transient force when the water is turned on or off.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters & CWatters
Hi
I believe that changing direction of velocity (with constant amount) DOS NOT generate Water Hammer (and it produces Force only), but not because of what you (CWatters) believe. You say Hammer will be generated if velocity becomes to zero or becomes more that zero (from zero). It is not right. Hammer occurs if velocity CHANGES (not just becomes zero). My justification is according to Jakowski's equation [dH= (a/g)dv]. In this equation dh is not vector, and dv can not be vector. because if dv be vector, then dH becomes vector.
But I am not sure about my reason.
Do you have another idea?
Thank you.
 
Mikealvarado100 said:
You say Hammer will be generated if velocity becomes to zero or becomes more that zero (from zero). It is not right. Hammer occurs if velocity CHANGES (not just becomes zero).

I agree. I was wrong to say it only occurs when the water is turned on or off.
 
Mikealvarado100 said:
I believe that changing direction of velocity (with constant amount) DOS NOT generate Water Hammer (and it produces Force only).
The term "hammer" indicates a very high momentary force and a corresponding abrupt change in velocity of an entire flow. A flow that moves continuously around an elbow results in no such momentary force.

We can, however, have a water hammer even without a 180 degree flow reversal. Consider a vertical water pipe on a moving train. The train is moving at 10 meters per second forward along the track. Water is flowing at 10 meters per second down the pipe and out from a valve at the bottom. From the point of view of a ground observer, the water movement is at a 45 degree angle down and forward. If the valve is closed there is an abrupt upward force. The entire flow stops moving vertically and is now moving at a 0 degree angle forward.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top