Understanding Wald's Book: Appendix E and the Einstein Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atrahasis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the derivation of the Einstein equation as presented in Appendix E of Wald's book "General Relativity." The user questions the treatment of the term h^{bc}\nabla_a(\delta g_{bc}) in equation (E.1.38) after establishing that h^{bc}\nabla_c(\delta g_{ab})=0 due to the boundary condition \delta g_{ab}=0 on the surface. The resolution of the confusion lies in understanding the nature of the covariant derivatives and their compatibility with the metric, leading to the conclusion that the term can indeed be integrated away.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with the Einstein equation in general relativity
  • Understanding of covariant derivatives and their properties
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in variational principles
  • Basic grasp of differential geometry concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Einstein equation in Wald's "General Relativity"
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in variational calculus
  • Learn about the properties of covariant derivatives in differential geometry
  • Investigate the role of surface terms in the action principle
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and differential geometry, will benefit from this discussion.

atrahasis
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question concerning the Wald's book: General Relativity.
In the appendix E, he derived the Einstein equation by considering the surface term (GHY).
I do not understand what he said after the equation (E.1.38).

Actually he considers that h^{bc}\nabla_c(\delta g_{ab})=0, because we fix \delta g_{ab}=0 on the surface, but therefore why the other term in (E.1.38) is not null, the term h^{bc}\nabla_a(\delta g_{bc}).

They look the same for me, and after some algebra, where we replace the covariant derivative by the one compatible with the metric on the surface we should have a total derivative term on the surface that we can integrate away.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok finally I got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
943
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K