Understanding Wald's Book: Appendix E and the Einstein Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter atrahasis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
atrahasis
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question concerning the Wald's book: General Relativity.
In the appendix E, he derived the Einstein equation by considering the surface term (GHY).
I do not understand what he said after the equation (E.1.38).

Actually he considers that h^{bc}\nabla_c(\delta g_{ab})=0, because we fix \delta g_{ab}=0 on the surface, but therefore why the other term in (E.1.38) is not null, the term h^{bc}\nabla_a(\delta g_{bc}).

They look the same for me, and after some algebra, where we replace the covariant derivative by the one compatible with the metric on the surface we should have a total derivative term on the surface that we can integrate away.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok finally I got it.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top