Understanding XRR: How to Determine Thin Film Sample Thickness with GenX"

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter IntentKnown
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the determination of thin film sample thickness using X-ray reflectometry (XRR) and the software GenX. Participants explore methods for analyzing XRR data, particularly for samples with varying thicknesses, such as wedge-shaped films composed of LSMO and PZT.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the need to interpret XRR data to determine the thickness of thin film samples, noting challenges with varying sputtering accuracy.
  • Another participant outlines basic features of XRR, including the relationship between critical angle, signal decay, and film thickness, and provides a mathematical expression for calculating thickness from interference maxima.
  • Suggestions are made to measure thickness at different locations on the wedge sample using repeated XRR measurements, though concerns about beam width are raised.
  • Alternatives such as using an ellipsometer for thickness measurements and calibrating it against XRR data are proposed.
  • Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is mentioned as a standard approach for obtaining accurate thickness data, though it may be more challenging to implement.
  • A reference to a book on X-ray physics is provided as a resource for further understanding XRR principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and approaches for determining film thickness, but no consensus is reached on a single best method, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential issues with beam width in XRR measurements and the varying accuracy of different measurement techniques. The discussion does not resolve the effectiveness of each proposed method.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and students working with thin film materials, particularly in the fields of ferroelectrics and ferromagnetics, as well as those interested in X-ray reflectometry techniques.

IntentKnown
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm currently an undergrad research assistant in a lab that is experimenting with the interface between ferroelectrics and ferromagnetics. We have many thin film samples with various thicknesses and we often need to find out the thickness of these samples,which are mostly LSMO and PZT, as the sputtering of said samples can be off sometimes.

My question is this:

How can I read our XRR data to find the thickness of our samples? I've not been able to find any resources that explain the reflection peaks in terms of characteristics of the sample, such as layer thickness, density...etc.

Also, we have a sample that is wedge shaped, where the LSMO has a thickness of ~100nm on one side, and tappers off to 0. This wedge is then on top of a constant layer of PZT. Is there any standard and well-proven method to find the changing thickness of this sample.

Lastly, any tips and tricks with GenX would be appreciated also.

THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic features are easy to remember/derive:

1. The critical angle (below which there are no interference oscillations) depends on the material density,

2. The decay in the signal strength with increasing incidence angle depends on the roughness,

3. The period of oscillations depends on the film thickness.

The expression for the thickness is (utilizing a small angle approximation) what you get from writing the equation for an interference maximum at a particular angle:

\alpha_m ^2 - \alpha _0 ^2 = (m \lambda/2t)^2,

where \alpha _m it the glancing angle at which the m'th maximum is detected, \alpha _0 is the critical angle (described above), t is the film thickness, etc.

Plotting the square of the angle against m^2 allows you to extract the values for the critical angle and thickness.

Usually, however, your XRD system comes with software that will fit your data to extract all three parameters (density, roughness, thickness). Also, the manual for the software will explain the principles of XRR and the fitting expressions.

What is the lateral size of the LSMO/PZT wedge sample?
 
Our sample is around 5mm squared.
 
The following are ideas you can think about:

1. Measure the thickness at different locations along the sample using repeated XRR measurements. The problem with this will be beam width. A micro-XRD would fix that problem, but those are not easy to come by.

2. You might have better luck finding a narrow beam on an ellipsometer. You can calibrate the ellipsometer against an XRR derived thickness from a uniform film sample, and use that to measure thickness at different positions along the wedge sample.

3. TEM - this is usually the standard approach for something like this. May be harder to do, but gives you the best data.
 
A good reference for XRR is the book "modern X-ray physics" by Als-Nielsen & McMorrow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
758
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K