Understanding Zero-G: Calculating Airplane Acceleration at Different Altitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter tahayassen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
Airplanes experience acceleration due to gravity, which affects passengers' perceived weightlessness during flight. The acceleration due to gravity can be calculated using the formula Gm/r^2, allowing for adjustments based on altitude. Gravity decreases slightly with altitude, approximately 0.3086 mGal per meter, but this change is minimal over short distances. During zero-g flight, airplanes follow a parabolic path, maintaining a downward acceleration of 1 g while traveling horizontally. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for modeling airplane motion, particularly in relation to sine wave equations.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
I understand that the airplane accelerates at the acceleration due to gravity in the downward direction, making the acceleration of the person relative to the airplane zero. But the acceleration due to gravity isn't constant, so I was wondering if someone could show me how you could calculate the acceleration needed for an airplane at certain altitudes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, wait. I'm so dumb...

acceleration due to gravity = Gm/r^2

From that formula, you could calculate the acceleration needed at different altitudes. I still don't understand how would I find the equation to model the airplane's position using sine waves. Any ideas?
 
Earth gravity decreases by about 0.3086 mGal per meter of increased altitude near the surface of the Earth. This is the free air correction.

As for your question, this is very tiny, even for a couple of kilometers of altitude change.
 
tahayassen said:
I still don't understand how would I find the equation to model the airplane's position using sine waves. Any ideas?
During the zero g portion of flight, the airplane is following a parabolic path (technically an elliptical path if you don't consider the Earth to be flat), with a downwards acceleration of 1 g and near constant horizontal component of velocity.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top