Unequal force at uneven attachment heights?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter derek88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of a cable suspended between two poles at different heights and the effects of wind on the tension in the cable. Participants explore the relationship between vertical and horizontal tension forces at the attachment points of the cable, considering both theoretical and experimental approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the vertical tension at the higher pole is greater than at the lower pole (Vtension1 > Vtension2) and infers that the horizontal tension must also follow this inequality (Ztension1 > Ztension2).
  • Another participant argues that the horizontal tensions at both poles may be equal (Ztension1 = Ztension2), suggesting that the angle of the cable relative to each pole affects the tension distribution.
  • A suggestion is made to conduct an experiment using a heavy string and Newtonmeters to measure the tensions directly, indicating that experimental results could clarify the debate.
  • One participant proposes a simplified model of the cable as a series of masses connected by massless strings, considering how this might influence the tension under wind conditions.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of a "blowout angle," hypothesizing that if wind force and cable weight are evenly distributed, the angle of swing would be consistent along the cable's length.
  • Participants discuss the potential for differing angles of tension due to the varying heights of the poles, with one suggesting that the taller pole might experience less z-tension due to its angle relative to the wind.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between vertical and horizontal tensions, with no consensus reached on whether Ztension1 is greater than, less than, or equal to Ztension2. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing hypotheses presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the problem, suggesting that assumptions about uniform distribution of forces and the geometry of the setup may influence outcomes. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of angles and experimental validation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in physics related to tension, forces, and experimental methods in mechanics.

derek88
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Unequal force at uneven attachment heights??

Friends:

My boss and I have been debating this physics problem:

Imagine that you have a cable suspended in between two poles (Pole 1 and Pole 2). The attachment height at Pole 1 is greater than that at Pole 2. As for the orientation of the x, y, and z-axis, let's say that the poles are set on the x-axis and they're pointing up in the direction as the y-axis. We both agree that the vertical tension (due to the cable) at Pole 1 is greater than the vertical tension at Pole 2, i.e. Vtension1 > Vtension2.

A wind blows on the cable. We will say that the wind blows along the z-axis. The cable swings outwards along the z-axis. This creates forces at the cable's pole attachments, in the z-direction (we can call the forces Ztension1 and Ztension2). I believe that since Vtension1 > Vtension2, it must be true that Ztension1 > Ztension2. My boss believes that Ztension1 = Ztension2. Which one of us is right?

I appreciate any thoughts on this problem! :):):)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This one is easy to set up in an experiment - rig two poles with a length of heavy string and a Newtonmeter at each end. This should be definitive, where any analysis can always be argued over.

You can also analyse a simplified picture by imagining now that the cable is a few masses joined by massless "string" and see how it plays out for different numbers of masses.

Formally:
http://www.aejm.ca/V4N1/Chatterjee.V4N1.pdf
... you'd have to modify this for crosswinds.

I'm thinking that if you sketch out the profile down the x axis, then the angle the cable makes to the tall pole will be less than the angle it makes to the short pole, which kinda suggests that the z-component of the tension against the tall pole is less than the short one.

Since the long side presents a larger surface area to the wind, it may get blown out more.
But I think the rule-of-thumb weight is leaning towards less z-tension for the tall pole. But it tells you what to watch for in the experiment.
Probably someone has a computer program for computing this.
 
Last edited:


Thanks for the reply!

I just assumed that the "blowout angle" (the angle from vertical) that the cable makes in a windy environment would be the same throughout the entire length. This is because I imagined that the cable was like a series of pendulums (just imagine an invisible string connecting each point of the cable to the axis of rotation). The angle of swing of a pendulum is Theta = arctan(Windforce/Cableweight). If we assume that both the wind force and the cable weight is evenly distributed, it seems that the blowout angle would be the same everywhere. Any thoughts?
 


Draw the picture you just proposed and you'll see you have to move one of the poles so it still connects with it's end of the cable.

But like I said - you can argue endlessly about this kind of thing. Either do the real math (see link) or do the experiment.
 


Well, I'll try to do the experiment by placing a stick on the ground and another on an elevated position, string a cable in between them, then turn on a big fan. I'll see if one stick falls down first or not. I'll post my results.
 


Sight along the two sticks and estimate the angles to each.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K