Uniform Circular Motion of Swinging Objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the tension in a rope of an object swinging in circular motion, given the angle of the rope, mass, and rope length. It clarifies that the tension is influenced by both vertical and radial forces, not solely vertical forces. The presence of tangential acceleration during non-uniform circular motion complicates the analysis. A free-body diagram is essential for visualizing the forces at play. Understanding the relationship between tension, gravity, and acceleration is crucial for solving this problem in physics.
Amenable Me
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am very confused with a particular aspect of part of my physics curriculum.

Let's say there is an object swinging on a rope swinging in a circular motion. The mass of the object, length of rope, and angle of rope relative to y-axis are known.

How does one derive the tension of the rope only given the angle, not the period or velocity? I have seen previous attempts use the weight of the object to determine the tension, but that seem to include all of the forces necessary (centripetal force?). Is the tension of a non-vertical rope depend entirely upon the vertical forces acting upon it?

I would greatly appreciate any help on this. It would help if you can answer it with physics and not math.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does one derive the tension of the rope only given the angle, not the period or velocity?
You also need the mass ... and you draw a free-body diagram.
Is the tension of a non-vertical rope depend entirely upon the vertical forces acting upon it?
No - it depends on the radial forces acting on it.

If, say, gravity is the only force acting, then the tension will provide a net unbalanced force pointing perpendicular to the rope (in the direction of the acceleration).
You should realize that, when something is swinging, the circular motion is not uniform - there is also a tangential acceleration.

It would help if you can answer it with physics and not math.
I hear you - but bear in mind that math is the language of physics.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top