Uniform continuity and derivatives

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving properties of functions with bounded derivatives. It establishes that if a function \( f \) has a bounded derivative \( |f'(x)| < M \) in the interval \( (a,b) \), then \( f \) is bounded in that interval. Furthermore, if \( f \) has a bounded second derivative, it is uniformly continuous in \( (a,b) \). The Mean Value Theorem is utilized to demonstrate these properties effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mean Value Theorem
  • Knowledge of bounded functions and derivatives
  • Familiarity with the concept of uniform continuity
  • Basic calculus concepts, including limits and continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Mean Value Theorem in greater depth
  • Explore the relationship between bounded derivatives and uniform continuity
  • Investigate examples of functions with bounded second derivatives
  • Learn about the implications of uniform continuity in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, calculus, and differential equations, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for educators seeking to clarify concepts related to derivatives and continuity.

daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1) f is some function who has a bounded derivative in (a,b). In other words, there's some M>0 so that |f'(x)|<M for all x in (a,b).
Prove that f is bounded in (a,b).
2) f has a bounded second derivative in (a,b), prove that f in uniformly continues in (a,b).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



1) For all x in (a,b), (f(x)-f(a))/(x-a) = f'(c) =>
|f(x)-f(a)| = |f'(c)||x-a| =< M|b-a| (c is in (a,x))
and so
f(a) - M|b-a| =< f(x) >= f(a) + M|b-a| and so f(x) is bounded in (a,b).

2)Using (1) we see that f'(x) is bounded in (a,b). So there's some M>0 so that |f'(x)|<=M. And so for all x,y in (a,b)
(f(x)-f(y))/(x-y) = f'(c) =< |M| and so
|f(x)-f(y)| =< |x-y|M and it's easy to see that f is UC in (a,b).

Did I do that right? It some what bothers me that in (1) I also could have proved that f is UC which is a stronger result than the fact that it's bounded the same way that I proved it in (2). Is that right? If so then why did they only ask to prove that it was bounded?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theorem: Let f be continuous on a (possibly infinite) interval I. Let J be the open interval without the endpoints of I. If f is differentiable on J and |f&#039;|\leq M then f is uniformly continuous on I.

Proof:Chose M&gt;0 so that |f&#039;(x)|\leq M for all x\in J. For any \epsilon &gt; 0 choose \delta = \frac{\epsilon }{M}.
Choose a&lt;b with b-a&lt;\delta. By Mean Value Theorem: \exists x \in (a,b) so that f&#039;(x) = \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}.
Thus,
|f(b)-f(a)| = |f&#039;(x)||b-a|\leq M|b-a| &lt; M\delta = M\cdot \frac{\epsilon}{M} = \epsilon.

-Wolfgang.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K