Uniform elecric fields- force and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the separation of conducting plates in a uniform electric field decreases the force acting on a charge, as described by the equation F = VQ/d. Consequently, this reduction in force leads to a decrease in the gain of kinetic energy, which is equivalent to the work done on the charge. However, if the charge remains constant, the voltage between the plates increases linearly with increased separation, affecting the overall energy dynamics. The stored energy in the capacitor is also influenced by the separation, as shown in the equations provided. Ultimately, the relationship between force, voltage, and kinetic energy is complex and depends on the specific conditions of the system.
chanderjeet
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
what is the effect on the force as well as the gain in kinetic energy if the separation of the conducting plates is increased?

I'm thinking that since F= VQ/d if the distance increases then the force would decrease. I could be wrong.

Since, the gain in KE is equivalent to the work done =Fd and since F decreases (I assume) then the KE would also decrease.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The stored energy in a capacitor is

W = (1/2)CV2= (1/2)Q2/C = (1/2)xQ2/e0A
where x = separation and A = area.
So Fx= (dW/dx)= (1/2)Q2/e0A
So if Q is an invariant, the force is independent of separation.
Also Fx = dW/dx = d/dx(1/2)CV2=(1/2)e0AV2 d/dx(1/x)= -(1/2)e0AV2/x2
where V is held constant.
Bob S
 
sorry, i didn't specify. I was referring to, say, a particle being released at the upper plate of horizontal parallel conducting plates. (in a vacuum)
 
In this case, Q=CV
so V = Q/C = Qd/e0A
where A = area and d the separation
so if Q = constant, and d is increased, the voltage between the plates increases linearly.

One way to generate high voltage between the plates is to charge them up when d is small, then separate the two plates.
Bob S
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top