Unique combinations in a set.(+)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Solumsen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinations Set
Solumsen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey there!

I will start of with saying I´m not very good at English when considering mathematical
terms, neither an expert in Math.

My question goes as this:

I have a set of 1000 questions - which will be given in rounds with a set of 10.
So every round, you get 10 questions out of the 1000.

We want to change out 5 questions in every round.
So we want to have not only to have the total number of combinations
where 1 question is unique - but where a set of 5 is.

Please, if the formulation is a bit misleading - i will try to clarify in a reply.
As i said, this is even hard for me to question in the right way!

- Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey Solumsen! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I don't understand …

you want 10 questions, each of which has not been asked before …

but that automatically means that any 5 of them will not have been asked before :confused:
 
The number of unique sets of 5 would be 1000!/(5!*995!).
The number of unique sets of 10 would be 1000!/(10!*990!).
The number of unique ways of grouping all unique sets of 10 into two groups of 5 would be (10!/(2*5!*5!))(1000!/(10!*990!)).

Since I can't quite figure out what the problem is, I don't know if any of this helps.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top