Unique Solution for IVP of Continuous Functions with Global Lipschitz Condition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an initial value problem (IVP) involving continuous functions defined on the space C[0,T] with a specific metric. The problem requires finding an integral operator that acts as a contraction under the given metric, which would imply the existence of a unique solution for the IVP.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the attempt to identify an appropriate integral operator that satisfies the contraction condition. There are questions about the validity of the proposed operator and whether the approach to demonstrating contraction is correct.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Lipschitz continuity to analyze the contraction property, but there is no clear consensus on the correct operator or method to demonstrate the contraction.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the choice of the integral operator and the method of showing contraction, indicating potential gaps in understanding the requirements of the problem.

Eulogy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the space of continuous functions C[0,T] suppose we have the metric ρ(x,y) =sup [itex]_{t\in [0,T]}[/itex]e[itex]^{-Lt}[/itex][itex]\left|x(t)-y(t)\right|[/itex] for T>0, L≥0.

Consider the IVP problem given by

x'(t) = f(t,x(t)) for t >0,
x(0) = x[itex]_{0}[/itex]

Where f: ℝ×ℝ→ℝ is continuous and globally Lipschitz continuous with
respect to x.

Find an integral operator such that the operator is a contraction on (C[0,T],ρ) and hence deduce the IVP has a unique solution on C[itex]^{1}[/itex][0,T]

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to show that the metric space (C[0,T],ρ) is complete, but I'm having problems finding an integral operator that is a contraction on the space. I've tried the operator
(Tx)(t) = [itex]x_{0}[/itex] + [itex]\int^{t}_{0}f(s,(x(s))ds[/itex]but I was not able to get a contraction. Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
try finding T|x-y| and then use the lipschitz continuity?
 
I have tried this but was unable to show it was a contraction. I'm not to sure if I have the wrong integral operator for this particular question or if I'm trying to show a contraction in the wrong way.
 
I'm not sure if your operator is contraction, but it does not seem to be a fixed point iteration operator at all ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K