Unit step function from piecewise

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing a piecewise function using unit step functions and subsequently taking its Laplace transform. The piecewise function is defined for different intervals of t, specifically around the values of π and 2π.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formulation of the piecewise function using unit step functions and question the validity of their expressions. There is discussion about matching parameters in the unit step function and the implications for the Laplace transform.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in expressing the function correctly using unit step functions, while others are clarifying the original question's requirements. There is a mix of attempts to understand the transformation process and the conditions under which the expressions hold.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to adhere to the definitions of the unit step function and the specific requirements of the homework task, which involves taking the Laplace transform of the piecewise function.

cdotter
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex] f(x) = \begin{cases}<br /> 0, & t < \pi \\<br /> t - \pi , & \pi \leq t < 2 \pi \\<br /> 0, & t \geq 2 \pi<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]

Homework Equations


Unit step function:
[tex]u_c(t) = \begin{cases}<br /> 0, & t < c \\<br /> 1 , & t \geq c \\<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]u_{\pi}(t)(t-\pi) - u_{2 \pi}(t)(t-2 \pi)[/itex] gives me:

[tex] f(x) = \begin{cases}<br /> 0, & t < \pi \\<br /> t - \pi , & \pi \leq t < 2 \pi \\<br /> \pi, & t \geq 2 \pi<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]

I'm not sure what to do to get the last inequality correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is [itex]u_{\pi}(t)(t-\pi) - u_{2 \pi}(t)(t- \pi)[/itex] allowed? That does work but the "c" doesn't match.
 
I figured it out. :smile: It is allowed, it just needs forcing.

[itex]u_{\pi}(t)(t-\pi) - u_{2 \pi}(t)(t- \pi) \rightarrow u_{\pi}(t)(t-\pi) - u_{2 \pi}(t)((t- \pi) - \pi)[/itex]

Now that it's in the form [itex]u_c(t)(t-c)[/itex], the Laplace transform can be taken:

[tex] \begin{aligned}<br /> F(s) &= L\{u_{\pi}t(t- \pi)-u_{2 \pi}(t)((t- \pi)- \pi)\}\\<br /> F(s) &= e^{- \pi s}L\{t\} - e^{-2 \pi s}L\{t- \pi\}\\<br /> F(s) &= \frac{e^{- \pi s}}{s^2} - e^{- 2 \pi s} \cdot (\frac{1}{s^2} - \frac{\pi}{s})<br /> \end{aligned}[/tex]
 
What the exact wording of the question?
 
SammyS said:
What the exact wording of the question?

The question asked to take the Laplace transform of the piecewise function. I had to create a step function and use [itex]L\{u_c(t)f(t-c)\} = e^{-cs}L\{f(t)\}[/itex], which I figured out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K