Universal Law of Gravitation described by complex functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of complex analysis to the Universal Law of Gravitation, specifically the equation f = GMm/r(t)^2. The user explores how this gravitational law can be represented using complex functions, particularly the function z(t) = x(t) + iy(t) in lieu of the vector function r(t) = (x(t), y(t)). The conclusion drawn is that both representations yield equivalent results since they both encapsulate the necessary information from the two real dimensions of the complex plane, independent of the algebraic properties that differentiate it from R².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts
  • Familiarity with the Universal Law of Gravitation
  • Knowledge of vector functions and their representations
  • Basic grasp of the properties of the complex plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of complex functions in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in complex analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between complex functions and vector calculus
  • Learn about the applications of complex analysis in gravitational physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics and mathematics, particularly those interested in the intersection of complex analysis and gravitational theory.

coolbeans777
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I didn't put this in any of the physics sections, because I'm only learning this as it pertains to complex analysis. This was just an example provided in a free complex analysis textbook. Basically what I'm asking is why for the law of gravitation, f = GMm/r(t)^2, and it equals the equation in the picture when described by complex functions.

http://i.minus.com/iblXBR9aafGTaZ.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me like they're just using the complex function z(t) = x(t) + iy(t) in place of a vector function r(t) = (x(t),y(t)). Since the only information you really care about is x(t) and y(t), the two representations will give you the same results.
 
Yes. This only uses the fact that the complex plane has two real dimensions. It has nothing to do with the algebraic properties that distinguish the complex plane from R2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K