B Unleashing the Power of Nuclear Borehole Cannon: Shooting Projectiles into Space

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Godspanther
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
Using a borehole to launch a tungsten projectile into space with nuclear devices is theoretically possible but poses significant challenges, including creating a large cavity from the explosion and environmental contamination. Alternatives like rail-gun systems or nuclear propulsion may be more viable, though they also raise concerns about spent nuclear cores and atmospheric reentry. Achieving Earth’s escape velocity of over 11 km/s would be problematic due to atmospheric pressure and heat, even for robust materials like tungsten. While this method could potentially transport bulk materials to space, the difficulty lies in safely releasing the payload after atmospheric escape. Overall, the concept highlights the complexities and risks associated with using nuclear technology for space launches.
Godspanther
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Can a borehole be used to shoot an object into space using a nuclear charge?
I was just wondering. If one used a shielded tungsten projectile and some small diameter nuclear devices could someone shoot a projectile into space by using a borehole drilled into the Earth like a cannon barrel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Godspanther said:
Summary:: Can a borehole be used to shoot an object into space using a nuclear charge?

I was just wondering. If one used a shielded tungsten projectile and some small diameter nuclear devices could someone shoot a projectile into space by using a borehole drilled into the Earth like a cannon barrel?
Yes one could do such a thing, but then one would likely have a large cavity where the device (say a kt (1 kiloton of TNT equivalent) or so) was detonated, not to mention the neutron-induced transmutation of the surrounding environment and contamination by fission products.

Rather, one might wish to use a rail-gun (electromagnetic) launch system, or a nuclear-power propulsion system. However, if one were to use a nuclear propulsion system, what would be the final disposition of the spent core (nuclear reactor)?
 
Last edited:
Earth’s escape velocity is just above 11 km/s. Ignoring the fact of having to survive the full pressure of a nuclear explosion, air would be a major problem. For comparison, the space shuttle reentry speed was around 8 km/s and it needed significant heat shielding to not burn up in the thinner upper atmosphere. Imagine what would happen to anything traveling at > 11 km/s through the dense lower atmosphere.
 
You may be aware of Operation Plumbob
The concrete plug from one leaky underground test was recorded with a vertical speed of 56 km/s which is 5 times escape velocity. Its final disposition is unknown.
Personally I am more fond of project Orion for inappropriate use of nuclear technology. Ya got to dream big.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes berkeman, mfb and anorlunda
I was not. Very interesting. One of the difficulties of getting objects into space is cost. Obviously this method would not work for anything sensitive like mechanical or electronics but for bulk mass like steel I beams for building space stations or to delivering the tungsten rods needed to arm a Project Thor style satellite it may work. The real difficulty would be releasing the material from the ballistic encasement used to help it survive escape from the atmosphere.
 
Godspanther said:
The real difficulty would be releasing the material from the ballistic encasement used to help it survive escape from the atmosphere.
"Everything is very simple in war, but the simplest thing is difficult." Clausewitz
 
Back
Top