Unleashing the Power of Nuclear Borehole Cannon: Shooting Projectiles into Space

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Godspanther
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon Nuclear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the feasibility of using a borehole cannon, potentially powered by nuclear devices, to launch projectiles into space. It covers theoretical implications, technical challenges, and alternative methods for achieving space launch, including considerations of materials and atmospheric conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using a shielded tungsten projectile with small diameter nuclear devices to launch objects into space via a borehole.
  • Concerns are raised about the consequences of detonating a nuclear charge, including the creation of a large cavity and environmental contamination from fission products.
  • Alternatives such as rail-gun systems or nuclear-powered propulsion are suggested as potentially more viable methods for launching objects into space.
  • One participant highlights the challenge of achieving escape velocity (over 11 km/s) and the issues related to atmospheric pressure and heat shielding during launch.
  • References to historical projects like Project Thor and Operation Plumbob are made to contextualize the discussion around kinetic bombardment and nuclear technology.
  • There is a suggestion that while this method may not be suitable for sensitive equipment, it could be used for bulk materials needed in space construction.
  • The difficulty of releasing materials from ballistic encasements after launch is noted as a significant challenge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and implications of using a borehole cannon for launching projectiles into space, with no consensus reached on the viability of the proposed method or its alternatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various technical challenges, including the effects of atmospheric entry and the need for specific materials, without resolving the complexities involved in the proposed methods.

Godspanther
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Can a borehole be used to shoot an object into space using a nuclear charge?
I was just wondering. If one used a shielded tungsten projectile and some small diameter nuclear devices could someone shoot a projectile into space by using a borehole drilled into the Earth like a cannon barrel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Godspanther said:
Summary:: Can a borehole be used to shoot an object into space using a nuclear charge?

I was just wondering. If one used a shielded tungsten projectile and some small diameter nuclear devices could someone shoot a projectile into space by using a borehole drilled into the Earth like a cannon barrel?
Yes one could do such a thing, but then one would likely have a large cavity where the device (say a kt (1 kiloton of TNT equivalent) or so) was detonated, not to mention the neutron-induced transmutation of the surrounding environment and contamination by fission products.

Rather, one might wish to use a rail-gun (electromagnetic) launch system, or a nuclear-power propulsion system. However, if one were to use a nuclear propulsion system, what would be the final disposition of the spent core (nuclear reactor)?
 
Last edited:
Earth’s escape velocity is just above 11 km/s. Ignoring the fact of having to survive the full pressure of a nuclear explosion, air would be a major problem. For comparison, the space shuttle reentry speed was around 8 km/s and it needed significant heat shielding to not burn up in the thinner upper atmosphere. Imagine what would happen to anything traveling at > 11 km/s through the dense lower atmosphere.
 
You may be aware of Operation Plumbob
The concrete plug from one leaky underground test was recorded with a vertical speed of 56 km/s which is 5 times escape velocity. Its final disposition is unknown.
Personally I am more fond of project Orion for inappropriate use of nuclear technology. Ya got to dream big.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, mfb and anorlunda
I was not. Very interesting. One of the difficulties of getting objects into space is cost. Obviously this method would not work for anything sensitive like mechanical or electronics but for bulk mass like steel I beams for building space stations or to delivering the tungsten rods needed to arm a Project Thor style satellite it may work. The real difficulty would be releasing the material from the ballistic encasement used to help it survive escape from the atmosphere.
 
Godspanther said:
The real difficulty would be releasing the material from the ballistic encasement used to help it survive escape from the atmosphere.
"Everything is very simple in war, but the simplest thing is difficult." Clausewitz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K