Unlimited Work Done in Free Space: The Impact of Force on Small Masses

AI Thread Summary
Applying force to a small mass in open space can theoretically lead to infinite displacement, but this does not result in infinite work done. Work is defined as the product of force and the distance over which it is applied, and once the force ceases, no additional work is done. The energy involved remains finite, specifically the kinetic energy of the mass. Thus, while displacement can be infinite, the work done is limited by the duration and magnitude of the force applied. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between force, displacement, and work in physics.
Tony Stark
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
If we apply force on a small mass in open space, then it will cover infinite displacement. Then would the mass have infinite work done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work only takes into account the distance over which the force is applied. Once the force stops acting, the work doesn't increase.
 
  • Like
Likes Tony Stark
Tony Stark said:
If we apply force on a small mass in open space, then it will cover infinite displacement. Then would the mass have infinite work done?

"Work" is energy. In your example, the energy is finite: namely the kinetic energy of the mass.
 
axmls said:
The work only takes into account the distance over which the force is applied. Once the force stops acting, the work doesn't increase.
Thanks a lot. It solved my problem clearly:smile::smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top