Unraveling the Mystery of Mass & Force: A 180 lb Person

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of mass and force, specifically in the context of a person weighing 180 pounds. Participants are exploring the relationship between force and mass in English units, questioning how to properly convert between these quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of mass and force, noting the confusion arising from the use of pounds as both a unit of force and mass. They explore the calculation of mass from a given force and question the proper units for mass in the imperial system.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the units of mass in the imperial system, suggesting that the slug is a relevant unit. There is an ongoing exploration of how to convert between pounds and slugs, as well as the implications of gravitational acceleration on these conversions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of unit conversions and the definitions of mass and force, particularly in the context of English units. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in distinguishing between different types of pounds and their respective roles in calculations.

Roundandround
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Understanding between force and mass
Relevant Equations
Word Question in Body
Background:
My understanding is force and mass are two different things.

Mass is how much matter is in a body
Force is mass multiplied by an acceleration. Here on earth, that acceleration is 32.2 Ft/s2.
Therefore, for the same mass, there can be different forces depending on the acceleration.

So, in English units, what is the mass of an 180 pound person, where 180 pounds is the force (F)?
i come up with:
mass = F/a = 180 lbs/32.2 Ft/sec2 = 5.59lbs-sec2/ft.

Not sure what I am doing wrong
Where have I gone wrong with the units?
What should be the proper unit for mass in english units?

Looking on line, some examples just convert the 180 pounds to kg, and announce 81.6kg (180/2.2) as the answer.
How can 81.6 kg be a mass when 180 pounds is a force and not a mass?

Many thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Roundandround said:
My understanding is force and mass are two different things.
Right.
Roundandround said:
Mass is how much matter is in a body
Inertial mass is defined as the resistance to acceleration, F/a.
(This is as distinct from gravitational mass, which determines how much gravitational force bodies exert on each other.)
Roundandround said:
Force is mass multiplied by an acceleration.
Right.
Roundandround said:
Here on earth, that acceleration is 32.2 Ft/s2.
That is gravitational acceleration, at Earth's surface, and it's only an average.
Roundandround said:
Therefore, for the same mass, there can be different forces depending on the acceleration.
Yes.
Roundandround said:
So, in English units, what is the mass of an 180 pound person, where 180 pounds is the force (F)?
Ah. The confusion generated by using pound for both force and mass is regrettable. Try reading https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force). Come back if you need any further explanation.
 
Roundandround said:
So, in English units, what is the mass of an 180 pound person, where 180 pounds is the force (F)?
i come up with:
mass = F/a = 180 lbs/32.2 Ft/sec2 = 5.59lbs-sec2/ft.

Not sure what I am doing wrong
Where have I gone wrong with the units? What should be the proper unit for mass in english units?

You haven't done anything wrong. One of the units of mass in the imperial system is the slug, with units in lbf*sec2/ft. Converting 180 pound-force to slugs using google gives me 5.59457 slugs, which is almost exactly what you came up with.

Roundandround said:
How can 81.6 kg be a mass when 180 pounds is a force and not a mass?

The kilogram is a unit of mass, and we can convert between force and mass as long as we know the gravitational acceleration of the object, which we do. A more massive object (i.e. an object with more mass, not one that is larger) will require a larger force to accelerate at the same rate as a less massive object. So if you know the acceleration is 32.2 ft/s2, you can measure the force applied to the object and then find the mass.

Note that the force applied by an object onto the ground due to its weight is identical to the force required to accelerate the object to the local gravitational acceleration (32.2 ft/s2 on average here on Earth). In other words, a mass of 81.65 kg requires a force of 180 pounds to accelerate it at a rate of 32.2 ft/s2.

Also, pound is actually the common name of several different units. There are pound-force (lbf), pound-mass (lb or lbm), and sometimes the poundal (pdl).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
Drakkith said:
You haven't done anything wrong. One of the units of mass in the imperial system is the slug, with units in lbf*sec2/ft. Converting 180 pound-force to slugs using google gives me 5.59457 slugs, which is almost exactly what you came up with.
To be more definitive, 1 slug = 32.2 lbm = 1 lbf s2/ft.
So if we clarify
Roundandround said:
mass = F/a = 180 lbs/32.2 Ft/sec2 = 5.59lbs-sec2/ft.
as referring to lbf, i.e. 180 lbf/32.2 Ft/sec2 = 5.59...lbf-sec2/ft, we get 5.59 slugs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K