Unraveling X-Ray Diffraction: Questions & Answers

Click For Summary
Measuring more diffraction peaks enhances resolution in X-ray crystallography by improving the clarity and separation of data points, which is crucial for accurate analysis. While larger crystals can contribute to better resolution, the relationship is not straightforward; factors such as crystal purity and the quality of the sample also play significant roles. Resolution is typically defined as half the wavelength of the X-ray used, and higher diffraction angles correlate with improved resolution, although deriving this from Bragg's Law can be challenging. The shape and dimensions of the unit cell can be chosen based on the need to encompass the entire molecule while allowing for effective tiling of the crystal; this choice can influence the resolution. Detergents can complicate crystallization by interfering with protein structure and solubility, affecting the overall quality of the crystallization process.
tahaha
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a physical chemistry project that is a report on a paper that uses X-ray crystallography to characterize a protein. So I am studying X-ray crystallography more in depth than the book introduces, and I have a few questions that I couldn't really find answers to online.

1. How does measuring more diffraction peaks improve resolution? Does that mean a LARGER crystal improve resolution? (I don't think it's that simple...)

2. How is the resolution defined? People online seem to say that the limit is wavelength/2, but I'm having trouble deriving it from the Bragg Law (I think a larger diffraction angle means higher resolution?)

3. Regarding the unit cell, do you just "choose" the shape and dimensions of the unit cell (square, triangular, oblique, etc.) as long as it contains at least one of each atom of your molecule? How does this choice affect the resolution?

4. This is pretty much a technical question: How do detergents interrupt crystallization?

Thank you!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Resolution is related to the instrument being used, as well as the sample. Larger, purer crystals give better data; if you are using powder diffraction then the purity is important, as well as the total quantity of material. See
http://www.proteinstructures.com/Experimental/Experimental/electron-density.htmlImproved separation of the diffraction peaks requires pure materials, or a binder that is "transparent" to the x-rays. Analysis is improved with more peaks and accurate intensity measurements - just imagine if the peaks were blurred together ...

The choice of unit cell arbitrary - as long you can "tile" the entire crystal with it; see http://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/crystallography3/unit_cell.php

This site has introductory tutorials on x-ray diffraction:
http://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/xray-diffraction/intro.phpDetergents are a complicated question - see http://www.piercenet.com/method/detergents-cell-lysis-protein-extraction
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K