Urgent advice on course choice in England

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between two degree options at the Open University: the BSc Natural Sciences: Physics Pathway and the BSc Mathematics and Physics. The key differences lie in their focus areas; the Natural Sciences pathway emphasizes experimental work, making it suitable for those interested in hands-on research, while the Mathematics and Physics degree leans towards theoretical physics and applied mathematics, offering more rigorous mathematical training. Both degrees include some overlap in coursework, but the choice should depend on individual interests in math versus physics and career aspirations. It's noted that neither degree is currently accredited by the Institute of Physics, and the Natural Sciences pathway has less math content, whereas the Mathematics and Physics degree lacks experimental lab work. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether the student prefers a research-oriented path or a theoretical approach.
CP1891
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently enrolling on a BSc Natural Sciences: Physics Pathway with the Open University in the UK and am a UK resident.

Just discovered that they have another degree: BSc Mathematics and Physics.

In respect to future opportunities which degree should I study? Shall I stick with the Natural Sciences: Physics pathway or change it before it begins in October to the Math & Physics degree?

Can anybody tell me the pro's and con's of each degree?

I would really appreciate any help.

Thank you .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I understand of the UK system (note I am an american, but was seriously considering study in the UK), the main difference from a career perspective has to do with a Theoretical vs. Experimental divide. A Natural Sciences Bsc is more experimentally based, or to put it differently, these degrees prepare you better to do experimental work in graduate school (If that's what you want to do) While a Physics and Mathematics Bsc is better preparation for Theoretical Physics/ Applied Mathematics. There are overlaps between the two (you still take math courses in the Natural Sciences track, and still learn about modern experiments in the Physics and Mathematics track), but the emphasis overall is different. If you feel you're not going to end up in experimental physics for grad school, I would suggest the Physics and Mathematics track, since the extra math you learn will be applicable in almost any job you take after school. On the other hand, If you like doing experiments, I would say Natural Sciences is the way to go. Also, this all depends upon how much you like math compared to physics.
 
I'm also interested and studying Physics at the Open University. On thing to consider is that neither degree is currently accredited by the IOP(Insitute of Physics).

The Natural Science pathway has too little maths content, where as the maths & physics degree does not contain any experimental/lab work. Of course this might not matter to you if your intention is not to follow a research based career.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top