The US Defence Budget: A Misallocation of Resources?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maximus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    budget Resources
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the allocation of the US defense budget, which some participants argue is excessively high compared to other nations. Participants explore the implications of reallocating funds from defense to other areas such as education, as well as the motivations behind current defense spending practices. The conversation touches on theoretical, political, and economic aspects of military funding and its impact on both domestic and international stability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration over the high defense budget, suggesting that reallocating even a fraction to education could significantly improve schools.
  • Others argue that the US defense spending is justified as it subsidizes the defense of allies and contributes to global stability, preventing large-scale warfare.
  • There is a mention of historical agreements, such as the WWII peace treaty with Japan, which obligates the US to provide defense.
  • Concerns are raised about the costs associated with military personnel and equipment, as well as the influence of political motivations on military spending.
  • Some participants question the necessity of such a large military budget in light of changing global threats, particularly the rise of terrorism.
  • Others highlight the potential for military budget cuts to impact social programs and question the effectiveness of current military strategies.
  • There are references to the political dynamics surrounding military contracts and the implications of privatizing public services.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the appropriateness of the current defense budget or the best use of funds. Some support the idea of reallocating resources, while others defend the existing military expenditures as necessary for national and global security.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical and political contexts that influence current defense spending, including treaties and geopolitical considerations. There are also mentions of the complexities involved in military budgeting, such as the interplay between defense needs and social program funding.

maximus
Messages
495
Reaction score
4
i read somewhere that the US defence budget is over three times that of the next highest nation and that we spend about 400 billion dollars annually on it. i can't help but think what would happen if we cut the budget by just a fraction and moved it into say education. we would have some of the finest schools in the world! why must we project sych an attitude into the world? such feelings of nessessary defence only add to the world's unrest. why can't we use our wealth better. god, i get so frusterated with this nation! [g) we are greedy pigs and war mongerers! (sorry I'm sort of venting) but why do we need this sheild, for christ's sake we are manifesting our own fears by doing it.
can i get some feedback?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by maximus
why must we project sych an attitude into the world? such feelings of nessessary defence only add to the world's unrest.
Chicken and the egg with this point though, surely.
 
True, but we're also by far the richest nation: defense spending is only 16% of the federal budget, and 3.2% of GDP. The world average for defense spending is about 3% of GDP.

In essence the USA is subsidizing the defense of its allies, namely NATO, Japan, etc. Arguably, this level of spending helps assure a relatively stable world free of large-scale warfare, as well as preventing an expensive and risky global arms race.
 
Originally posted by damgo
In essence the USA is subsidizing the defense of its allies, namely NATO, Japan, etc. Arguably, this level of spending helps assure a relatively stable world free of large-scale warfare, as well as preventing an expensive and risky global arms race.
Not just "in essence" - its by law (for Japan anyway). Its part of the WWII peace treaty that in exchange for Japan having a limited military, the US would provide for the defense of Japan.

The current situation is simply an extension of NATO, which is a mutual defense treaty. If any country in the western world is attacked, the US will defend it. Many countries have used this fact as a reason to slash their own defense spending. After the fall of the USSR, this left the US with by far the most powerful military in the world. And that of course both pleases and scares a lot of people.
 
you also have to take into account the amount of money it costs just to employ all of the personnel that work for the military and all of they equipment that they use.
 
Hmm... whatever happened to Rumsfeld's plans for a more streamlined, versatile and cost effective military?
 
Originally posted by FZ+
Hmm... whatever happened to Rumsfeld's plans for a more streamlined, versatile and cost effective military?
He's done some good, but there is a long way to go. Its neither easy nor quick to rebuild the military.
 
Hmm... whatever happened to Rumsfeld's plans for a more streamlined, versatile and cost effective military?
Right. Rumsvelt, hey isn't that a German name? Aw he's just another tool like Fleischer.


____________
"Accept the result of a free election!" -- Mikhail Gorbechev, 1989, on the eve of the Birth of the New Polish Republic, and the Demise of the Soviet Union.
 
Originally posted by schwarzchildradius
Right. Rumsvelt, hey isn't that a German name? Aw he's just another tool like Fleischer.
So the Bush administration is just a bunch of Nazis and Jews? Ohhhhh, so THATS why there is so much infighting. Lmao.
 
  • #10
Hey, I never said they were Nazis. I just like to point out the few instances where they use tried and true methods employed by not only the Nazis but other guys in history. Obviously they're not racist against Jews.
 
  • #11
Originally posted by russ_watters
So the Bush administration is just a bunch of Nazis and Jews? Ohhhhh, so THATS why there is so much infighting. Lmao.

LOL I think you suggested that... not schwarzchildradius

i read somewhere that the US defence budget is over three times that of the next highest nation and that we spend about 400 billion dollars annually on it.

Guys, you are the biggest most powerful nation on this planet. You need defence against who?
 
  • #12
Originally posted by Guybrush Threepwood

Guys, you are the biggest most powerful nation on this planet. You need defence against who?

It's not all spent in defense of our nation, much is spent in the defense of our interests, including those in other countries. An example would be the 50 billion+ a year we have been spending to protect Saudi Arabia and it's oil.
 
  • #13
Originally posted by kat
It's not all spent in defense of our nation, much is spent in the defense of our interests, including those in other countries. An example would be the 50 billion+ a year we have been spending to protect Saudi Arabia and it's oil.

just a thought, but maybe you shouldn't pump money in other countries. I know my government is good at taking money from others and making them dissapear...
I wouldn't trust the arabs much...
 
  • #14
The military budget is overloaded with politically-motivated purchases of bad equipment at overinflated prices. Also, the Repugnicans WANT social programs to fail. That is their goal.
 
  • #15
Originally posted by Guybrush Threepwood
Guys, you are the biggest most powerful nation on this planet. You need defence against who?

Until just a few years ago, that answer was clear. Now with the end of the Cold War, the US is redefining its military & defense strategies. It seems that our historically big military which was designed to ward off other big militaries is not quite the right fit for dealing with our new concern...small pockets of terrorist groups scattered across the world (including inside countries that we consider allies).
 
  • #16
Originally posted by maximus
i can't help but think what would happen if we cut the budget by just a fraction and moved it into say education. we would have some of the finest schools in the world!

The U.S. already has some of the finest schools in the world. :smile: (universities in particular)

But yeah, there are countless other worthy programs that could be considered...or we could even lower taxes.

Overall, I think the US military is changing...but I'm not so sure that it will be any cheaper.
 
  • #17
That's an understatement! Behind all this is an idealistic effort to convert the public services to private enterprises, is a mainstream opinion. The national annual debt ceiling has been raised, quietly, last month in order to avoid a national default. The sky's the limit on hand-selected military contractors.
After (SEC) handing out fines to Worldcom, the pentagon is giving them hundreds of millions in contracts, effectively laundering the fruits of their monumental fraud for them. How sweet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
10K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 870 ·
30
Replies
870
Views
116K