Use the experimental values to calculate the enthelpy change in the system.

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the enthalpy change in the system, use the experimental values of 100.0 mL of 1.00 M KOH and 100.0 mL of 1.00 M HBr, with initial and final temperatures of 20.0°C and 22.5°C, respectively. The heat exchanged can be determined using the specific heat of water, assuming constant pressure. The enthalpy variation is equivalent to the heat exchanged under these conditions. The calculation requires applying the formula for heat transfer, which involves the mass of the solution and the temperature change. Completing this calculation will yield the enthalpy change for the reaction.
Frank665
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Use the experimental values to calculate the enthalpy change in the system.

Observation Experiment
Quantity of reactant 1 100.0 mL of 1.00 M KOH(aq)
Quantity of reactant 2 100.0 mL of 1.00 M HBr(aq)
Initial Temperature (oC) 20.0
Final Temperature (oC) 22.5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frank665 said:
Use the experimental values to calculate the enthalpy change in the system.

Observation Experiment
Quantity of reactant 1 100.0 mL of 1.00 M KOH(aq)
Quantity of reactant 2 100.0 mL of 1.00 M HBr(aq)
Initial Temperature (oC) 20.0
Final Temperature (oC) 22.5

If your teacher didn't give you the (constant pressure, I assume) specific heats, it should mean he assumes you use the one of water, so you can easily find the heat exchanged (at constant pressure it's = enthalpy variation).
Of course I won't make the computations for you, this is an homework.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top