Using a vacuum system to hold a part

  • Thread starter Thread starter dingpud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of vacuum systems as a method for holding parts during machining or assembly processes. Participants explore the feasibility, effectiveness, and existing solutions related to using vacuum systems instead of traditional clamping methods, with a focus on applications in manufacturing and machining.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the practicality of using a vacuum system as a vise, suggesting it could prevent damage to surfaces compared to clamping.
  • Another participant notes that vacuum systems are commonly used in industry, particularly in assembly line manufacturing, and provides links to suppliers of vacuum handling equipment.
  • Concerns are raised about whether a Venturi pump would provide sufficient vacuum pressure for holding parts securely.
  • It is mentioned that atmospheric pressure can provide significant holding force, and that a vacuum of 90% can yield 90% of this force.
  • A participant describes the use of vacuum systems in screen printing to prevent substrates from lifting with the screen, indicating practical applications beyond machining.
  • One participant discusses the specific scenario of machining aluminum and questions the industry standards for using vacuum systems to hold parts against cutting forces.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to understand the sideways forces exerted by cutting tools, noting that vacuum systems may struggle with lateral loads.
  • A suggestion is made to consider magnetic retainers for holding non-magnetic materials like aluminum, referencing a successful application in a machine shop.
  • A participant shares a low-cost solution for vacuum clamps, recommending a specific seller on eBay for purchasing vacuum hold-down systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness and practicality of vacuum systems for holding parts, with no clear consensus on the best approach or specific industry standards. Some participants agree on the commonality of vacuum systems in industrial applications, while others raise concerns about their limitations.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various factors affecting the effectiveness of vacuum systems, including the need for flat and smooth surfaces, the impact of sideways forces during machining, and the potential for alternative holding methods like magnetic retainers. These considerations highlight the complexity of implementing vacuum systems in practice.

dingpud
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
Has anyone out there used a vacuum system as a vise? We've been tossing the idea around about suctioning a part to a table as opposed to clamping or screwing it down. This will keep the surfaces from becomming marred or dinged up.

Any suggestions, or does anyone know of any sites or systems already doing this?

Not sure if the Venturi pump (aspirator) would be a high enough vacuum pressure system for this or not.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
dingpud said:
Not sure if the Venturi pump (aspirator) would be a high enough vacuum pressure system for this or not.
You generally don't need a very high vacuum.
Atmospheric pressure is 15psi or 1kg/cm^2 so this is the most you can achieve. But with 90% vacuum you get 90% of this force.

As Q_Goest said it is very common. A very useful tool for small electronics is a vacuum pick, a little syringe like thing with a vacuum and a release button - it let's you pick tiny parts and put them down precisely.
 
This isn't exactly the same thing, but screen printing machines (at least, the one's that I used) have vacuum holes in the table to prevent the vinyl or other substrate from sticking to the ink and being lifted with the screen after a squeegie pass. It works quite well, as long as the holes remain clear of gunk.
 
Say I wanted to machine a block of aluminum. Rather than clamp it to a milling table, I want to turn a vacuum on and have the part withstand the friction from the cutter. I can see if being done, and I've heard of people doing things close to this, but I wasn't sure what (if any) the industry standard was...

Ex. 6" x 6" x 2" aluminum where I want to run a quick 1/8" end mill through the center. The chip to chip time (time to machine) should be less than the amount of time it takes to set the part up and clamp it into position...
 
Simply picking up the Aluminium would only need 3kg or about 3cm^2 or 0.5 sq in of vacuum.
Holding it against a cutter is a little trickier - you would have to know what sideways force the cutter is applying. Generally vacuum systems don't do that well against sideways loads. To get the vacuum to hold you want the vacuum chuck and the piece it is holding to be nice and flat and smooth - which means they tend to slide around.

It's like when you put down a flat piece of metal onto some oil or water, it's hard to lift it straight up against the air pressure - but it's easy to slide it around.
 
Have you considered a magnetic retainer? The surface grinder in my old high-school machine shop used one, and it held like crazy. For a non-magnetic material such as aluminum, you can surround it with steel stop-blocks held by the magnet.
 
those are good ideas...I am going to look into those.

thanks
 
Cheep solution for vacuum clamps

The cheepest and easiest way to do a vacuum hold down system is to do what I did. I bought clamps from a guy who has been selling them on Ebay for years. Each set is only 25 bucks which is less than what I pay for machine bits. I just ordered his double sided clamps too to try out. The single sided work perfect. Check it out. You can just search Google.com for dcad100. That is his Ebay user name.

Good luck,
Catch you later
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K