Using Ampere's Law for these two different integration paths

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Ampere's Law in two scenarios involving magnetic fields and integration paths. In situation A, it is suggested that since no currents are enclosed, Ampere's Law cannot be effectively used, and the magnetic field varies along the path, requiring vector addition instead. For situation B, the contributor expresses uncertainty about using Ampere's Law, noting that conductors outside the path can still influence the magnetic field, leading to the conclusion that the magnetic field is not uniform along the dotted circle. The moderator clarifies that while Ampere's Law applies to any closed path, its utility is limited to cases with symmetry; otherwise, numerical methods like the Biot-Savart law are recommended for accurate calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of symmetry in applying Ampere's Law effectively.
WannaLearnPhysics
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement:: The magnetic field at every point on the path of integration
Relevant Equations:: The scenarios/situations are shown in the attached photo.

"Any conductors present that are not enclosed by a particular path may still contribute to the value of B field at every point, but the line integrals of their fields around the path are zero" This is the statement from Young and Freedman's University Physics with Modern Physics.

For situation A, I'm thinking that since no currents are enclosed, we can't really use Ampere's law to know the magnetic field at a certain point on the dotted circle. In this case (suppose that the conductors are very long, and straight), we should use B = μI/2πr and do vector addition. This means that the magnetic field at every point on the dotted circle is not the same. I'm sure about this, but I just want to verify if I'm correct.

My real problem is situation B. If I use ampere's law then that means that the magnetic field at every point on the path (dotted circle) is just B=μI(encl)/2πr. I don't think this is correct because just like the statement above, conductors not enclosed by the path may still contribute to the value of B. I'm thinking that this is similar to situation A wherein the magnetic field at every point on the dotted circle is not the same (considering the currents outside the circle and their distances to a certain point), which means I should follow the principle of superposition of magnetic fields.Additional question. Can I say "consider the conductors to be really heavy" to imply that they stay in place or that their distances to the points on the circle remain constant?

[Moderator's note: Moved to a technical forum since the questions are about general understanding..]
 

Attachments

  • ampere's law.png
    ampere's law.png
    10.7 KB · Views: 188
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Ampere's law applies for any closed path, regardless of the shape of the path and whether or not it encloses conductors. However, it is only useful to calculate the B-field when you can use the symmetry of the problem to see (for example) that the B-field is constant along the path you have chosen. When there is no symmetry, like in the pictures you have uploaded, I don't see any way to use Ampere's law to calculate the B-field. In cases like these, you typically have to use numerical codes to calculate the B-field by numerically carrying out the Biot-Savart law integrals.
 
  • Like
Likes WannaLearnPhysics, nasu and etotheipi
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K