Using chilled air to cool water

  • Thread starter Thread starter saseafoods
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Cool Water
AI Thread Summary
Chilling large volumes of seawater using chilled air is being explored as a method to reduce water temperatures by 1-2C in an aquaculture facility. The facility pumps approximately 800L/sec of water and is currently trialing compressors and diffusers for oxygenation. While using chilled air at -20C was proposed, experts suggest that using chilled water with heat exchangers or evaporative cooling methods would be more efficient. The initial water temperature is 23C, with minimal daily fluctuation, and daytime air temperatures can reach 40C. Ultimately, relying on chilled air may not provide significant advantages over ambient air and could be more costly.
saseafoods
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We are looking to chill large volumes of seawater using chilled air. Does anyone know of an equation that may help us work out how much chilled air would be required to cool the water?

To give you some background to the project, we are an aquaculture facility pumping approx 800L/sec of water throughout the farm. We are trialling the use of compressors and diffusers to increase oxygen levels in the water. However, we would also like to reduce our water temperatures by 1-2C during the middle of summer. One thought was to use chilled air (-20C) instead of ambient air.

Does this sound feasible? Any suggestions?

Cheers,

Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

It would be more efficient to use chilled water and heat exchangers to chill the water. But it would be even more efficent to use evaporative cooling (cooling towers) to do it.

What are the initial water temperature and night-time air temperature and humidity?
 
Thanks.

Peak water temperatures reach 23C, although there is very little fluctuation throughout the day (1C max). Daytime air temperatures can reach 40C with night temperatures as cool as 10C.

Heat exchangers have been investigated but are cost-prohibitive for the volume of water we are using. As we are aerating the water in this trial, the idea of using cold air instead of ambient was one that was thrown up as a cheap way of possibly cooling the water. Do you think this would work?
 
if you use air blowing, the primary cooling would be from increased evaporation rates instead of heat transfer from water to air, so cooled air should not have significant advantages over ambient air while being significantly more expensive.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top