Using chilled air to cool water

  • Thread starter Thread starter saseafoods
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Cool Water
AI Thread Summary
Chilling large volumes of seawater using chilled air is being explored as a method to reduce water temperatures by 1-2C in an aquaculture facility. The facility pumps approximately 800L/sec of water and is currently trialing compressors and diffusers for oxygenation. While using chilled air at -20C was proposed, experts suggest that using chilled water with heat exchangers or evaporative cooling methods would be more efficient. The initial water temperature is 23C, with minimal daily fluctuation, and daytime air temperatures can reach 40C. Ultimately, relying on chilled air may not provide significant advantages over ambient air and could be more costly.
saseafoods
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We are looking to chill large volumes of seawater using chilled air. Does anyone know of an equation that may help us work out how much chilled air would be required to cool the water?

To give you some background to the project, we are an aquaculture facility pumping approx 800L/sec of water throughout the farm. We are trialling the use of compressors and diffusers to increase oxygen levels in the water. However, we would also like to reduce our water temperatures by 1-2C during the middle of summer. One thought was to use chilled air (-20C) instead of ambient air.

Does this sound feasible? Any suggestions?

Cheers,

Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

It would be more efficient to use chilled water and heat exchangers to chill the water. But it would be even more efficent to use evaporative cooling (cooling towers) to do it.

What are the initial water temperature and night-time air temperature and humidity?
 
Thanks.

Peak water temperatures reach 23C, although there is very little fluctuation throughout the day (1C max). Daytime air temperatures can reach 40C with night temperatures as cool as 10C.

Heat exchangers have been investigated but are cost-prohibitive for the volume of water we are using. As we are aerating the water in this trial, the idea of using cold air instead of ambient was one that was thrown up as a cheap way of possibly cooling the water. Do you think this would work?
 
if you use air blowing, the primary cooling would be from increased evaporation rates instead of heat transfer from water to air, so cooled air should not have significant advantages over ambient air while being significantly more expensive.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top