Using continuity to evaluate a limit of a composite function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on evaluating limits of composite functions using continuity and the epsilon-delta definition. The user utilized a Graphics Calculator to find the roots of the quadratic equation ##x^2 - 2x - 4##, yielding ##x_1 = 3.236## and ##x_2 = -1.236##. The conversation highlights the importance of domain restrictions in limit evaluation and the relationship between polynomial behavior and its roots. The user seeks clarification on applying their method to obtain specific values excluded by their domain restrictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus, specifically the epsilon-delta definition.
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions and their properties, including roots and behavior.
  • Experience with graphical calculators for solving equations.
  • Knowledge of polynomial inequalities and continuity concepts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth.
  • Learn about polynomial root-finding techniques, including the quadratic formula.
  • Explore the implications of continuity on limits and polynomial behavior.
  • Investigate graphical methods for evaluating limits using tools like Desmos or GeoGebra.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on limits, continuity, and polynomial functions. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of limit evaluation techniques and the application of graphical tools in calculus.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1680658325619.png

1680658335960.png

The solution is,
1680658369794.png

However, I tried to solve this problem using my Graphics Calculator instead of completing the square. I got the zeros of ##x^2 - 2x - 4## to be ##x_1 = 3.236## and ##x_2 = -1.236##

Therefore ##x_1 ≥ 3.236## and ##x_2 ≥ -1.236##

Since ##x_1 > x_2## then,

Therefore ## (x | x ≥ -1.236 ) ## which is ##~(x | x ≥ 1 - \sqrt{5} )~## (sorry curly brackets were not working), however, my domain restriction excludes some other values shown in the solution. Dose anybody please know a way using my method to get those values?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the process of ##lim_{x\rightarrow 4}## we put x in the region ##(4-\epsilon, 4+\epsilon)## for any small positive number ##\epsilon##, which is in your {x| 3.236<x} but not in {x|x<-1.236}.

For an example of another exercise of ##lim_{x\rightarrow -2}## we put x in the region ##(-2-\epsilon, -2+\epsilon)## for any small positive number ##\epsilon##, which is not in your {x| 3.236<x} but is in {x|x<-1.236}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
anuttarasammyak said:
In the process of ##lim_{x\rightarrow 4}## we put x in the region ##(4-\epsilon, 4+\epsilon)## for any small positive number ##\epsilon##, which is in your {x| 3.236<x} but not in {x|x<-1.236}.

For an example of another exercise of ##lim_{x\rightarrow -2}## we put x in the region ##(-2-\epsilon, -2+\epsilon)## for any small positive number ##\epsilon##, which is not in your {x| 3.236<x} but is in {x|x<-1.236}.
Thank you for your reply @anuttarasammyak !

Sorry, I have not really done by epsilon-delta definition of a limit.

Many thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this problem,
View attachment 324502
View attachment 324503
The solution is,
View attachment 324504
However, I tried to solve this problem using my Graphics Calculator instead of completing the square. I got the zeros of ##x^2 - 2x - 4## to be ##x_1 = 3.236## and ##x_2 = -1.236##

Therefore ##x_1 ≥ 3.236## and ##x_2 ≥ -1.236##

Since ##x_1 > x_2## then,

Therefore ## (x | x ≥ -1.236 ) ## which is ##~(x | x ≥ 1 - \sqrt{5} )~## (sorry curly brackets were not working), however, my domain restriction excludes some other values shown in the solution. Dose anybody please know a way using my method to get those values?

Many thanks!

For P(x) = ax^2 + bx + c:

If P has only a single real root, or no real roots:
  • If a &gt; 0 then P(x) \geq 0 everywhere.
  • If a &lt; 0 then P(x) \geq 0 only at the real root (if any).
If P has two distinct real roots r_1 &lt; r_2:
  • If a &gt; 0 then P(x) \geq 0 for x \leq r_1 or x \geq r_2 ("outside the roots").
  • If a &lt; 0 then P(x) \geq 0 for r_1 \leq x \leq r_2 ("between the roots").

All of these results follow from the facts that P(x) is positive for all sufficiently large |x| if a &gt; 0 and negative for all sufficiently large |x| if a &lt; 0 and that a polynomial only changes sign at a real root of odd multiplicity.

Alternatively, by completing the square you can reduce this to either |x - p| \leq q or |x - p| \geq q. The first has the interpretation that x is at most q units away from p, ie. p - q \leq x \leq p + q. The second has the interpretation that x is at least q units away from p, ie. x \leq p -q or x \geq p + q.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
This seems a case of using continuity implies sequential continuity. ( Though the converse is false).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K