Using double integration to find area of a cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the area of a cylinder defined by the equation x²+y²=1, specifically the portion above the xy-plane and below the plane z=3y. The user attempted to parametrize the function using r(t,z)=icos(t)+jsin(t)+kz and computed the necessary partial derivatives. An error in the limits of integration was identified, where the correct limits for t should be from 0 to π instead of 0 to 2π. After correcting this, the user successfully found the correct area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integration techniques
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically cross products
  • Proficiency in parametric equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of double integrals in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about parametrization of surfaces in three-dimensional space
  • Explore the concept of limits in integration and their impact on results
  • Investigate vector calculus operations, particularly cross products and their geometric interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus or engineering courses, educators teaching multivariable calculus, and anyone interested in applications of double integration in geometric contexts.

liishii
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the area of that portion of a cylinder x^2+y^2=1 lying above the xy-plane and below the plane z=3y.

Homework Equations


dr=sqrt(1+fx2+fy2[/SUB])dxdy

or

dr=|ru x rv| dudv

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to parametrize the function in terms of theta (t) and z. I got r(t,z)=icost+jsint+kz. Then, I found the partials with respect to t and z and got: rt=-sinti+costj and rz=z, where t=0 to 2pi and z=0 to 3y=3sint.
I took the cross product of the two partials to get icost+jsint+0k. I used the cross product to find |rt x rz|=1. Then, plugging this into the second equation above, I got the answer to be 0, which is incorrect. What am I doing wrong?? Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your limits for t are wrong. Remember, you only want the part above the xy-plane.
 
oh that makes sense! so the t limits had to be from 0 to pi, not 2pi.
I got the right answer! Thanks so much vela!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K