Using dummy variable to integrate (formal solution of rad. trans eqn)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the radiative transfer equation, specifically the equation dI/dτ = -I + S. The solution involves substituting I(τ) = f(τ)ebτ, leading to the relationship S = e-τdf/dτ. The key step discussed is integrating the function S eτ with respect to a dummy variable t, resulting in f(τ) - f(0) = ∫₀^τ S e^t dt, where f(0) is denoted as c0. This approach clarifies the necessity of using a different variable for integration limits to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, particularly the radiative transfer equation.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, especially using dummy variables.
  • Knowledge of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
  • Experience with variable substitution in integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the fundamental theorem of calculus in detail.
  • Learn about dummy variables in integration and their applications.
  • Practice solving differential equations similar to the radiative transfer equation.
  • Explore integration techniques for exponential functions, particularly in the context of physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying radiative transfer, as well as mathematicians focusing on differential equations and integration techniques.

ck99
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(Everything here is frequency dependent, but I have left off the v from all the variables to minimise chance of typos - hopefully that is ok but please let me know if not and I will try and retype!)

The equation of radiative transfer is

dI/dτ = -I + S

We guess that I(τ) = f(τ)e

Taking the derivative of this gives

dI/dτ = fbe + edf/dτ

which is just the same as

dI/dτ = bI + edf/dτ

Substituing this back into the first equation gives

bI + edf/dτ = -I + S

So b = -1 and

S = edf/dτ

I have been able to follow all this but the next step is where I get lost - my lecture notes go straight to

f = ∫Setdt + c0 (Integral limits from 0 to τ)

"where t is a dummy variable".



Homework Equations



All given above I think

The Attempt at a Solution



My approach was to go from

S = edf/dτ

df/dτ = Seτ

Separate variables

df = Seτ

Then integrate from 0 to f and from 0 to τ

f = ∫Seτ

But I'm not sure how to do that integral and (according to my notes) it is the wrong approach anyway! If someone could fill in the gaps and take me step-by-step through the method used in the notes it would be really helpful. I don't get how this other variable t is allowable or useful? Or where the c0 comes from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ck99 said:
df/dτ = Seτ (*)

Separate variables

df = Seτ

Then integrate from 0 to f and from 0 to τ
You can't just choose different integration limits on both sides of the equation. You are allowed to integrate both sides but you should choose consistent limits, so let's choose 0 to τ:

\int_0^\tau \frac{df(t)}{dt} \, dt = \int_0^\tau S e^t \, dt

You will see that I picked your equation which I marked by (*), as I'm not too fond of writing df = ... dt.

As τ is an integration limit, you need another variable in the integration, if the use of t and τ confuses you, you are also allowed to call it x:
\int_0^\tau \frac{df(x)}{dx} \, dx = \int_0^\tau S e^x \, dx

Or you can give the integration limit a different name, e.g. x:
\int_0^x \frac{df(\tau)}{d\tau} \, d\tau = \int_0^x S e^\tau \, d\tau

Let's use the first equation. I hope you're still with me.
On the left hand side, we have the fundamental theorem of calculus saying we will get f(τ) - f(0).
On the right hand side, well, we can't really do much with that integral. So now we have
f(\tau) - f(0) = \int_0^\tau S e^t \, dt
so you can pull f(0) over to the right hand side and call it c0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K