Laplace Transform with Integral Convolution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the Laplace Transform of an integral involving a convolution of functions, specifically the integral of (t-τ)cos(2(t-τ))e^(-4τ) from 0 to t. The subject area is Laplace Transforms and convolution in the context of differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the identification of functions f(t) and g(t) within the context of the convolution theorem. Questions arise regarding the nature of the convolution and whether substitutions are necessary. Some participants express uncertainty about the structure of the functions involved, particularly with the repeated use of (t-τ).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the convolution setup and questioning each other's understanding. Some guidance has been offered regarding the identification of functions and the structure of the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the integral and the potential for multiple interpretations of the functions involved. There is also mention of confusion stemming from sleep deprivation affecting clarity in understanding the problem.

mechGTO
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the Laplace Transform of
∫(from 0 to t) (t-τ)cos(2(t-τ))e-4τ

using Laplace Transform tables.


Homework Equations


I know the basic convolution theorem is
(f*g)(t) = ∫f(τ)g(t-τ)dτ


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure if this is double convolution or if I'm missing an easy substitution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mechGTO said:

Homework Statement


Determine the Laplace Transform of
∫(from 0 to t) (t-τ)cos(2(t-τ))e-4τ

using Laplace Transform tables.

Homework Equations


I know the basic convolution theorem is
(f*g)(t) = ∫f(τ)g(t-τ)dτ

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure if this is double convolution or if I'm missing an easy substitution.

1. What are ##f(t)## and ##g(t)## in this problem?
2. What is the formula for ##\mathcal L(f*g)##?
 

1. I'm not sure because I've never seen (t-tau) twice in one of these.
2. Laplace(f*g) = F(s)G(s)
 
mechGTO said:
1. I'm not sure because I've never seen (t-tau) twice in one of these.

As an example, what would ##g(t-\tau)## be for ##g(t) = t^2\sin(t)##?
 
In that problem, it would be setup so that f(t) = t^2 and g(t) = sin(t) making the convolution integral

∫ from 0 to t: t2*sin(t-τ) dτ

and then integrated using trig identities
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
As an example, what would ##g(t-\tau)## be for ##g(t) = t^2\sin(t)##?

mechGTO said:
In that problem, it would be setup so that f(t) = t^2 and g(t) = sin(t) making the convolution integral

∫ from 0 to t: t2*sin(t-τ) dτ

and then integrated using trig identities

No. You didn't answer my question. I didn't ask you anything about convolution. Given ##g(t) = t^2\sin(t)## what would ##g(\pi/2)## be? ##g(s)##? ##g(t-\tau)##?
 
\int_0^t (t-\tau)cos(2(t-\tau))e^{-4\tau} d\tau

it looks as if f(t) = t and g(t) = cos(2*f(t))

Would it make sense to do a simple substitution and end up doing the integral

\int_0^t u\cdot cos(2u) du

giving \frac{1}{2} u\cdot sin(2u) + cos(2u)

\frac{1}{2} t\cdot sin(2t) + cos(2t)

and then taking the laplace of those?
 
LCKurtz said:
No. You didn't answer my question. I didn't ask you anything about convolution. Given ##g(t) = t^2\sin(t)## what would ##g(\pi/2)## be? ##g(s)##? ##g(t-\tau)##?

I would say g(t-τ) would be (t-τ)2sin(t-τ)
 
mechGTO said:
\int_0^t (t-\tau)cos(2(t-\tau))e^{-4\tau} d\tau

it looks as if f(t) = t and g(t) = cos(2*f(t))

Would it make sense to do a simple substitution and end up doing the integral

\int_0^t u\cdot cos(2u) du

giving \frac{1}{2} u\cdot sin(2u) + cos(2u)

\frac{1}{2} t\cdot sin(2t) + cos(2t)

and then taking the laplace of those?

No. You are missing the point of the problem. Just answer my question in my previous post for now. That will maybe give you an idea.
 
  • #10
mechGTO said:
I would say g(t-τ) would be (t-τ)2sin(t-τ)

OK, so you see how you can have more than one ##t-\tau## for a function. Now can you identify ##f(t)## and ##g(t)## in your original problem?
 
  • #11
LCKurtz said:
OK, so you see how you can have more than one ##t-\tau## for a function. Now can you identify ##f(t)## and ##g(t)## in your original problem?

Yes, I do. Does that mean my attempt was incorrect?
 
  • #12
LCKurtz said:
OK, so you see how you can have more than one ##t-\tau## for a function. Now can you identify ##f(t)## and ##g(t)## in your original problem?

mechGTO said:
Yes, I do. Does that mean my attempt was incorrect?

If you mean your attempt in post #7, yes that is incorrect. Where did the exponential go in that post? But never mind that. What do you get for ##f(t)## and ##g(t)##? Do you see how to do the problem knowing those and using post #3?
 
  • #13
ahh, got it. thanks a lot.

(sleep deprivation makes you miss things)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K