Using Euler Lagrange in General Relativity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 7K views
pixel2001n
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to follow a professor's notes for finding Christoffel symbols for a two-sphere. He gives the following two equations:

The Lagrangian for a two sphere:[tex]L = \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2 + sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2[/tex]

The Euler Lagrange equation:[tex]\frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (dx^\mu/ds)} \right ) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x^\mu} = 0[/tex]

Using these, the professor magically gets:

for [tex]x^\mu = \theta[/tex]:[tex]2\frac{d^2\theta}{ds^2} - 2 sin\theta cos\theta \left(\frac{d\phi}{ds^2}\right)[/tex]

for [tex]x^\mu = \phi[/tex]:[tex]2sin^2 \theta \frac{d^2\phi}{ds^2} + 4 sin\theta cos\theta \left(\frac{d\theta}{ds}\frac{d\phi}{ds}\right)[/tex]

And the Christoffel symbols can be found with minimal effort. The problem is that I can't follow the derivation to get the equations. I feel like this is a really simple thing, yet I'm having trouble getting the same answer as he showed.For example, in the [tex]\theta[/tex] case:

[tex]\frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\theta/ds)} \left( \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2\right)\right ) <br /> + <br /> \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\theta/ds)} \left(sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2\right)\right ) <br /> - <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}\left(\left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2\right)<br /> - <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}\left(sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2\right) = 0[/tex]

[tex]2 \frac{d^2\theta}{ds^2}<br /> + <br /> \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\theta/ds)} \left(sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2\right)\right ) <br /> - <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}\left(\left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2\right)<br /> - <br /> 2 sin\theta cos\theta \left( <br /> \frac{d\phi}{ds} <br /> \right)^2<br /> <br /> <br /> = 0[/tex]

But I don't see how to drive the other terms to zero.

The [tex]\phi[/tex] case is even worse:

[tex] \frac{d}{ds} <br /> \left( <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\phi/ds)}<br /> \left(<br /> \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> \right )<br /> +<br /> \frac{d}{ds} <br /> \left( <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\phi/ds)}<br /> \left(<br /> sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> \right )<br /> <br /> -<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}<br /> \left(<br /> \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> <br /> -<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}<br /> \left(<br /> sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> <br /> = 0[/tex]

[tex] \frac{d}{ds} <br /> \left( <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\phi/ds)}<br /> \left(<br /> \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> \right )<br /> +<br /> \frac{d}{ds} <br /> \left( <br /> 2 sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)<br /> \right )<br /> <br /> -<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}<br /> \left(<br /> \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> <br /> -<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}<br /> \left(<br /> sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2<br /> \right)<br /> <br /> = 0[/tex]

I'm not sure how to simplify it from there, since each time I try a method I get the wrong answer. I especially don't see where his [tex]+4sin\theta cos\theta[/tex] came from.

All my attempts have failed. It seems like such a trivial thing, since the professor left it out. And obviously the results are correct since they give the correct Christoffel terms. I would be eternally grateful if someone with a working knowledge of how to combine ordinary and partial derivatives could give me a step by step.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial (d\theta/ds)} \left(sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2\right)\right ) \equiv \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \left(sin^2\theta \left( z \right)^2\right)\right )[/tex]

This term is zero, because [tex]\left(sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2\right)\right )[/tex]
is not explicitly dependent on [tex]\frac{d\theta}{ds}[/tex].

All your troublesome terms disappear for similar reasons.
 
pixel2001n said:
I'm trying to follow a professor's notes for finding Christoffel symbols for a two-sphere. He gives the following two equations:

The Lagrangian for a two sphere:[tex]L = \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2 + sin^2\theta \left( \frac{d\phi}{ds} \right)^2[/tex]

The Euler Lagrange equation:[tex]\frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (dx^\mu/ds)} \right ) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x^\mu} = 0[/tex]
.

Mentz114 already gave you the explanation. Are you familiar with the Lagrangian approach in ordinary mechanics? If so, recall that is the time derivative of a variable does not appear in the lagrangian the corresponding conjugate momentum is conserved because [tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q} = 0[/tex] . It's the same type of thing here.

Maybe it would be useful to write the Lagrangian as

[tex]L = \dot{\theta}^2 + \sin^2 \theta (\dot{\phi})^2[/tex]


where a dot indicates a derivative with respect to s, obviously.

And now you must think of [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex] as independent variable (same for [itex]\phi[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex]).

For example,

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}} = 2 \dot{\theta}[/tex]
simply.

Then it's a snap to get the correct result from the E-L equations
 
kdv said:
And now you must think of [itex]\theta[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex] as independent variable (same for [itex]\phi[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\phi}[/itex]).

That was my problem. Thanks guys.