Using separation of variables in solving partial differential equations

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
Kindly see attached;
Relevant Equations
separation of variables, in essence breaking down a pde into two ordinary differential equations.
I am reading on this part; and i realize that i get confused with the 'lettering' used... i will use my own approach because in that way i am able to work on the pde's at ease and most importantly i understand the concept on separation of variables and therefore would not want to keep on second guessing on the 'letters used' in the textbook notes ...as attached below;

1639098155539.png

1639098179127.png


This is (my approach) steps to the working...
##U_t ##= ##k U_{xx}##
Let ##U(x,t) ##= ##X(x) T(t)##
Therefore,
##XT^{'}##=## kX^{''}T##
##\frac{T^{'}}{kT} ##=##\frac{X^{''}}{X} ##=##-λ##
From here we have one initial condition,i.e ##u(x,0)##=##f(x)## and two spatial boundary conditions, i.e ##u_x(0,t)=0## and ##u_x(L,t)=0##
Therefore using the Boundary conditions, we shall have,
##u_x##= ##X'T##
##0##=##X'(0)T(t)## and also, ##0= X'(L)T(t)##
If ## T(t)=0##, then we shall have a trivial solution and therefore for a non- trivial solution to be realized we need to have,
##X'(0)=0## →##X'(L)=0##
and therefore our problem is reduced to,
##T'+λkT=0## and ##X^{''} + λX=0##
##U_x(0)=0##
##U_x(L)=0##
I intend to use this approach in problems related to pde...regards,
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This was not a question, rather my way of handling the pde's ...the intention was to keep you informed on my way of solving future pde's on the forum. I guess it should not be regarded as unanswered thread...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top