Using separation of variables in solving partial differential equations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of separation of variables to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), specifically the equation U_t = k U_{xx}. The author expresses a preference for their own approach to avoid confusion with the notation used in textbooks, which enhances their understanding of the concept. They outline their method, starting with the assumption U(x,t) = X(x)T(t) and deriving the necessary conditions for non-trivial solutions. The author emphasizes the importance of boundary conditions in their approach, leading to the reduced equations T' + λkT = 0 and X'' + λX = 0. This discussion serves as a way for the author to share their problem-solving strategy for future PDEs in the forum.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
Kindly see attached;
Relevant Equations
separation of variables, in essence breaking down a pde into two ordinary differential equations.
I am reading on this part; and i realize that i get confused with the 'lettering' used... i will use my own approach because in that way i am able to work on the pde's at ease and most importantly i understand the concept on separation of variables and therefore would not want to keep on second guessing on the 'letters used' in the textbook notes ...as attached below;

1639098155539.png

1639098179127.png


This is (my approach) steps to the working...
##U_t ##= ##k U_{xx}##
Let ##U(x,t) ##= ##X(x) T(t)##
Therefore,
##XT^{'}##=## kX^{''}T##
##\frac{T^{'}}{kT} ##=##\frac{X^{''}}{X} ##=##-λ##
From here we have one initial condition,i.e ##u(x,0)##=##f(x)## and two spatial boundary conditions, i.e ##u_x(0,t)=0## and ##u_x(L,t)=0##
Therefore using the Boundary conditions, we shall have,
##u_x##= ##X'T##
##0##=##X'(0)T(t)## and also, ##0= X'(L)T(t)##
If ## T(t)=0##, then we shall have a trivial solution and therefore for a non- trivial solution to be realized we need to have,
##X'(0)=0## →##X'(L)=0##
and therefore our problem is reduced to,
##T'+λkT=0## and ##X^{''} + λX=0##
##U_x(0)=0##
##U_x(L)=0##
I intend to use this approach in problems related to pde...regards,
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This was not a question, rather my way of handling the pde's ...the intention was to keep you informed on my way of solving future pde's on the forum. I guess it should not be regarded as unanswered thread...
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...

Similar threads