Using the Divergence Theorem on the surface of a sphere

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around applying the divergence theorem to solve an integral over the surface of a sphere, specifically the integral of 1/|r-r'|. The user expresses confusion regarding the correct application of the divergence theorem, questioning whether the result is a scalar or a vector. Clarifications are sought on the nature of the integrand and the surface element, as well as the appropriate form of the divergence theorem being utilized. The conversation highlights the distinction between scalar and vector results based on the chosen formulation of the theorem. Ultimately, there is a consensus that the notation used in the equations may lead to ambiguity, particularly in distinguishing between position vectors and their magnitudes.
TheGreatDeadOne
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let a sphere of radius r_0 be centered at the origin, and r′ the position vector of a point p′ within the sphere or under its surface S. Let the position vector r be an arbitrary fixed point P.
Relevant Equations
Divergence theorem (it's not really necessary, but I'm trying to solve it that way)
The integral that I have to solve is as follows:

\oint_{s} \frac{1}{|r-r'|}da', \quad\text{ integrating with respect to r '}, integrating with respect to r'

Then I apply the divergence theorem, resulting in:

\iiint \limits _{v} \nabla \cdot \frac{1}{|r-r'|}dv' = \int_{0}^{r_0}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{(r-r')}{|r-r'|^3}r'^2\sin{\theta}d\theta d\phi dr'

Integrating θ and φ we have:

4\pi \int_{0}^{r_0} \frac{(r-r')}{|r-r'|^3}r'^2 dr'

And in that part I got stuck. I didn't try to solve it by integrating directly, because I'm still a bit confused. I know the result is:
\frac{4\pi r^{2}_{0}}{r} \quad\text{for} \quad r\geq r_0 \quad and \quad 4\pi r^{2}_{0}\quad for \quad r\leq r_0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am a bit confused on which variation of divergence theorem you are using. Can you write it explicitly?

The final result is a scalar or a vector? It seems it is a scalar by what you say at the last sentence, but the divergence theorem as you set it up in the above equation it seems to give a vector result (r and r' are vectors right)?
 
TheGreatDeadOne said:
Homework Statement:: Let a sphere of radius r_0 be centered at the origin, and r′ the position vector of a point p′ within the sphere or under its surface S. Let the position vector r be an arbitrary fixed point P.
Relevant Equations:: Divergence theorem (it's not really necessary, but I'm trying to solve it that way)

The integral that I have to solve is as follows:

\oint_{s} \frac{1}{|r-r'|}da', \quad\text{ integrating with respect to r '}, integrating with respect to r'
What exactly is the vector-vector function you have to integrate over the surface of the sphere?
 
Delta2 said:
I am a bit confused on which variation of divergence theorem you are using. Can you write it explicitly?

The final result is a scalar or a vector? It seems it is a scalar by what you say at the last sentence, but the divergence theorem as you set it up in the above equation it seems to give a vector result (r and r' are vectors right)?
it's a scalar (lol I saw the error here, i forgot to fix it here)
 
ehild said:
What exactly is the vector-vector function you have to integrate over the surface of the sphere?
Delta2 said:
I am a bit confused on which variation of divergence theorem you are using. Can you write it explicitly?

The final result is a scalar or a vector? It seems it is a scalar by what you say at the last sentence, but the divergence theorem as you set it up in the above equation it seems to give a vector result (r and r' are vectors right)?
Sorry, I forgot to organize and correct something here. 1 / | r-r '| is a scalar, in my papers I was disregarding the module, forget that part of the divergence theorem.
 
Better we take things from start, you say you want to calculate $$\oint \frac{1}{|r-r'|}da'$$. The integrand is a scalar as you said, but what about da' is it scalar or vector (with direction the normal to the surface element da').

I have in mind two variations of the divergence theorem:
  1. $$\iiint_V \nabla\cdot\vec{F} dV=\oint_{\partial V} \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{A}$$
  2. $$\iiint_V \nabla f dV=\oint_{\partial V} f d\vec{A}$$
In 1. ##\vec{F}## is a vector but because we take the divergence in the LHS (and the dot product in the RHS) the final result is scalar.
in 2.## f## is a scalar but because we take the gradient of ##f ## in the LHS (and the multiplication of## f## by the vector surface element ##d\vec{A}## in the RHS) the final result is a vector

So which one are you using. I think you are using 2. with ##f=\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}## but then the final result is a vector not a scalar.

But then again if I strictly follow your notation, you seem to take the divergence of a scalar, you write $$\nabla\cdot\frac{1}{|r-r'|}$$ while you should probably mean the gradient there.

I have to say this, in this thread and in the other thread with the gradient, your notation is a bit ambiguous, you seem to use the symbol r (or r') to denote both the position vector and the magnitude of the position vector interchangeably.
 
Last edited:
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...