Using the Divergence Theorem on the surface of a sphere

TheGreatDeadOne
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let a sphere of radius r_0 be centered at the origin, and r′ the position vector of a point p′ within the sphere or under its surface S. Let the position vector r be an arbitrary fixed point P.
Relevant Equations
Divergence theorem (it's not really necessary, but I'm trying to solve it that way)
The integral that I have to solve is as follows:

\oint_{s} \frac{1}{|r-r'|}da', \quad\text{ integrating with respect to r '}, integrating with respect to r'

Then I apply the divergence theorem, resulting in:

\iiint \limits _{v} \nabla \cdot \frac{1}{|r-r'|}dv' = \int_{0}^{r_0}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{(r-r')}{|r-r'|^3}r'^2\sin{\theta}d\theta d\phi dr'

Integrating θ and φ we have:

4\pi \int_{0}^{r_0} \frac{(r-r')}{|r-r'|^3}r'^2 dr'

And in that part I got stuck. I didn't try to solve it by integrating directly, because I'm still a bit confused. I know the result is:
\frac{4\pi r^{2}_{0}}{r} \quad\text{for} \quad r\geq r_0 \quad and \quad 4\pi r^{2}_{0}\quad for \quad r\leq r_0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am a bit confused on which variation of divergence theorem you are using. Can you write it explicitly?

The final result is a scalar or a vector? It seems it is a scalar by what you say at the last sentence, but the divergence theorem as you set it up in the above equation it seems to give a vector result (r and r' are vectors right)?
 
TheGreatDeadOne said:
Homework Statement:: Let a sphere of radius r_0 be centered at the origin, and r′ the position vector of a point p′ within the sphere or under its surface S. Let the position vector r be an arbitrary fixed point P.
Relevant Equations:: Divergence theorem (it's not really necessary, but I'm trying to solve it that way)

The integral that I have to solve is as follows:

\oint_{s} \frac{1}{|r-r'|}da', \quad\text{ integrating with respect to r '}, integrating with respect to r'
What exactly is the vector-vector function you have to integrate over the surface of the sphere?
 
Delta2 said:
I am a bit confused on which variation of divergence theorem you are using. Can you write it explicitly?

The final result is a scalar or a vector? It seems it is a scalar by what you say at the last sentence, but the divergence theorem as you set it up in the above equation it seems to give a vector result (r and r' are vectors right)?
it's a scalar (lol I saw the error here, i forgot to fix it here)
 
ehild said:
What exactly is the vector-vector function you have to integrate over the surface of the sphere?
Delta2 said:
I am a bit confused on which variation of divergence theorem you are using. Can you write it explicitly?

The final result is a scalar or a vector? It seems it is a scalar by what you say at the last sentence, but the divergence theorem as you set it up in the above equation it seems to give a vector result (r and r' are vectors right)?
Sorry, I forgot to organize and correct something here. 1 / | r-r '| is a scalar, in my papers I was disregarding the module, forget that part of the divergence theorem.
 
Better we take things from start, you say you want to calculate $$\oint \frac{1}{|r-r'|}da'$$. The integrand is a scalar as you said, but what about da' is it scalar or vector (with direction the normal to the surface element da').

I have in mind two variations of the divergence theorem:
  1. $$\iiint_V \nabla\cdot\vec{F} dV=\oint_{\partial V} \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{A}$$
  2. $$\iiint_V \nabla f dV=\oint_{\partial V} f d\vec{A}$$
In 1. ##\vec{F}## is a vector but because we take the divergence in the LHS (and the dot product in the RHS) the final result is scalar.
in 2.## f## is a scalar but because we take the gradient of ##f ## in the LHS (and the multiplication of## f## by the vector surface element ##d\vec{A}## in the RHS) the final result is a vector

So which one are you using. I think you are using 2. with ##f=\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}## but then the final result is a vector not a scalar.

But then again if I strictly follow your notation, you seem to take the divergence of a scalar, you write $$\nabla\cdot\frac{1}{|r-r'|}$$ while you should probably mean the gradient there.

I have to say this, in this thread and in the other thread with the gradient, your notation is a bit ambiguous, you seem to use the symbol r (or r') to denote both the position vector and the magnitude of the position vector interchangeably.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top