Using the Euclidean Algorithm to Find Values for x and y in Linear Combinations?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 154x + 260y = 4 using the Euclidean algorithm, the process involves working backwards through the algorithm's steps. The calculations show how to express 4 as a linear combination of 154 and 260 by substituting values derived from the algorithm. The final values obtained are x = -54 and y = 32, which satisfy the equation. This method effectively demonstrates how to find integer solutions for linear combinations using the Euclidean algorithm. Understanding this approach is crucial for solving similar linear Diophantine equations.
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I need to be able to plug in appropriate x and y values for:

154x + 260y = 4

I guess this is done by working the euclidean algorithm backwards. But how do you do that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, it's been like forever and a day since I did problems like this, but I think it goes something like this:

154x + 260y = 4

260 = (1)*154 + 106
154 = (1)*106 + 48
106 = (2)*48 + 10
48 = (4)*10 + 8
10 = (1)*8 + 2
8 = (4)*2

4 = 2*2 = 2*(10-8) = 2*(10-(48-4*10))
= 10*10 - 2*48
= 10*(106 - 2*48) - 2*48
= 10*106 - 22*48
= 10*(260 - 154) - 22*(154-106)
= 10*260 - 32*154 + 22*106
= 10*260 - 32*154 + 22*(260-154)
= 32*260 - 54*154

so x = -54 and y = 32
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top