UV Spectroscopy - Absorbance vs transmission

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In UV spectroscopy, absorbance (A) is defined as A = ecl, where e is the molar absorptivity, c is the concentration, and l is the path length. Transmission (T) is defined as T = It/Io, where It is the transmitted light and Io is the incident light. The relationship between absorbance and transmission is established through the equation A = -log(T), which indicates that transmission is a physical quantity derived from recorded data, while absorbance is defined based on this transmission. The Lambert-Beer law underpins these definitions, illustrating the interplay between absorption and transmission in UV spectroscopy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of UV spectroscopy principles
  • Familiarity with Lambert-Beer law
  • Knowledge of absorbance and transmission equations
  • Basic concepts of light interaction with matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lambert-Beer law in detail
  • Explore the significance of molar absorptivity in UV spectroscopy
  • Learn about the effects of sample thickness on absorbance measurements
  • Investigate the applications of UV spectroscopy in various scientific fields
USEFUL FOR

Students, researchers, and professionals in chemistry, biochemistry, and analytical science who are involved in UV spectroscopy and its applications in measuring absorbance and transmission.

Moogie
Messages
167
Reaction score
1
Hi

In UV spectrscopy, is the definition of absorbance (A = ecl) derived from the definition of transmission (T = It/Io) where It is the transmitted light and Io is the incident light, or is the definition of transmission defined from absorbance.

Also A = -log(T) and T = 10^-A = 10-ecl.

It looks to me as though transmission is a physical quantity based on recorded data and then the definition of absorbance is based on this

thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hello,
In UV both transmission and absorption occurs..
You transmits the light and the sample absorbs the light..
May be you are familiar with Lambert-Beer law.
 
Moogie said:
It looks to me as though transmission is a physical quantity based on recorded data and then the definition of absorbance is based on this

That's essentially correct; there is a slight difference in that absorbance can be expressed in terms that do not depend on the thickness of the sample (e.g. e*c, if I understand what you wrote).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
28K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K