How do different materials interact with light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how different materials interact with light, focusing on phenomena such as reflection, absorption, emission, and transmission. Participants explore these interactions from various perspectives, including theoretical frameworks and practical examples, while addressing concepts like the photoelectric effect and scattering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes how glass transmits visible light because its electrons cannot be elevated by these frequencies, while also questioning how heat absorption and reflection relate to the photoelectric effect.
  • Another participant asserts that the photoelectric effect is not a suitable starting point for understanding optics and suggests that absorption is not the only interaction between light and matter.
  • A participant distinguishes between black body thermal emission and emission/absorption lines, suggesting that both mechanisms exist in various light sources, such as light bulbs and hydrogen gas.
  • There is a query about whether the absorption process must involve electron energy level resonance and whether there is a direct counterpart to black body emission.
  • Another participant mentions that scattering is an important consideration, independent of energy levels, and describes how transparent objects transmit light through coherent forward scattering.
  • Discussion includes the role of delocalized electrons in metals and how they interact with incoming light waves, generating outgoing replicas based on efficiency that varies with metal and wavelength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms of light interaction with materials, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the explanations provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of how electromagnetic fields interact with matter, as well as the need for more comprehensive educational resources on the topic.

God Plays Dice
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Could someone please clear this up for me. We have,

Reflection (metal, mirror)
Reflection (colour)
Absorption (heat)
Emission (heat)
Transmission (glass)

Sry but I use photoelectric effect to reference electrons absorbing photons of specific energies to be excited to higher energy levels, I don't know if it's strictly the term I should use but you get my point...

Firstly, glass.

Transmission: glass is able to transmit visible light because it's electrons cannot be elevated into a higher energy level by these frequencies. This I know is true.

Emission: A spectrum of frequencies are emitted by a body depending on their temperature. Hotter bodies spectra centred around higher frequencies. Doesn't involve electron energy levels. I know this to be true.

Absorption: I can only assume that this doesn't involve electron energy levels either (photoelectric effect), because a black t shirt absorbs all wavelengths of visible light...

Reflection: green t shirts absorb all light except that of green wavelength that they reflect. Is this the electron energy level mechanism? If so, how can white t shirts reflect all visible wavelengths in this way... Same intuition as black t shirts, it doesn't make sense to call it as photoelectric effect type interaction.

So the problem... Glass is transmissive to visible because it doesn't interact via photoelectric, but then how do you explain heat absorption and reflection as photoelectric effect as black and white t shirts would require many different electron ground state energies to absorb/remit the whole visible spectrum in this way.

Extra bit, metal mirror: Specular reflection as the surface is smooth vs diffuse reflection in the rough surface of the white t shirt. Delocalised electrons reflect light of all visible wavelengths, apparently I have read that is not photoelectric effect either, it is to do with the fact that the e are delocalised that they can interact with the em field and reflect the energy, but I don't know how this done either.

So there it is, I was told at A level that lights interaction with atoms was mostly photoelectric e=hug photons but then the above doesn't suggest that it is at all. I know high frequency incident light is however, ionising radiation etc. I wasn't taught anything about how it's electromagnetic field interacts, heat is absorbed emitted and reflection mechanism, only the standard angles of reflection and snells law and diffraction etc

Please clarify/suggest a book that details all this.Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
Science news on Phys.org
E=hf Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
The photo-electric effect is not a good place to start for optics.

Nor is absorption the only possible interaction between light and matter.

Here is an elementary introduction: http://celsus.as.arizona.edu/~cmeakin/pima2010/LightAndMatter.pdf
It will provide you with a better starting point.

This is a more advanced presentation, using many of the same slides:
http://www.astro.virginia.edu/class/whittle/astr1220/05_Light_Matter/light.pdf

Here is a module on light, with a self-test:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/light/u12l2c.cfm

Undergraduate physics texts which cover electromagnetic field theory, or an optics text will go into this material very thoroughly. For example: Griffith's "Introduction to Electromagnetism"; Hecht "Optics".

Or the Feynman "Lectures on Physics", volume I.Note: these forums have discussed other issues with the content of the A level physics courses. They seem to be in need of an update!
 
Thanks for this, this is great. Couple of queries though...

There are two mechanisms for creating light. Black body thermal continuous spectrum, caused by inter atomic/ intermolecular collisions/ charged particle interactions. Nothing to do with electron energy levels.

And emission/absorption lines, which are exactly that.

So firstly to clarify, everything should have both. A light bulb will have a black body and tungsten (absorption or emission?) lines, and hot hydrogen gas will have a black body and hydrogen emission lines as shown in the slideshow, (added emissions from molecular collisions/vibrations exciting electrons then dropping down).

So am I right in saying the absorption process must be through electron energy level resonance, ie there is no direct absorption counterpart to black body emission?

Then there is slide 47 of the first document. There is a spectra associated with molecular rotational/vibrational emission ( hydrogen gas shown) Is this actually black body emission but in practise rather than in theory?

Finally a red object appears red as when exposed to a spectrum it absorbs the other primary colours as heat and reflects/ scatters red. How does the reflection/scattering process occur? As a reflected wave or as remitted photons?

Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
Read up on slide 47, it's relatively weak and due to the electric dipole of the molecule rotating or vibrating sinusoidally and so emitting light, so I get it. Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
You must also consider scattering ... which is independent of energy levels. For example, transparent objects transmit light via coherent forward scattering - the Huyghens wavelet model gives the idea.

Metals strongly absorb at all frequencies - but the induced electron motions from the incoming light wave generates an outgoing replica; depending on the metal and the wavelength this process is more or less efficient ... 50 to 90% for common merals, the modern techniques for changing the surface can improve this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
24K