I Vacuum decay likelihood and consequences

KleinMoretti
Messages
112
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
what is the likelihood of a vacuum decay ever happening and what would be the consequences.
what is the likelihood of a vacuum decay happening, like is it something that is really considered and taken seriously by scientists or is it just wild speculation that is not really taken seriously but makes for good headlines?

Also if vacuum decay does happen what exactly would be the consequences, like I have read that the most extreme case is the destruction of the universe but what exactly does that mean, is everything in the universe actually destroyed including the energy of the universe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd vote it "wild speculation" at best. But it makes great click-bait so you'll see it often on pop science websites and news feeds.

Now if you want to worry about something more pressing, Andromeda will collide with the Milky Way and probably the central black holes will merge. I afraid that the resulting radiation as the merged galaxy becomes a quasar will wipe out all life. Even if we have interstellar travel by then there's nowhere in the galaxy to hide. 😅
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top