Validating the Probability Function f(x) for Zero-Inflated Poisson Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter mekhi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poisson Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on validating the probability function f(x) for a Zero-Inflated Poisson Distribution. The user initially expresses confusion about whether to integrate or sum the function to demonstrate its validity. After some clarification, they realize that a summation from 0 to infinity is the correct approach instead of integration. The user has since worked through the problem and is seeking confirmation on their solution. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the difference between integration and summation in probability functions.
mekhi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



f(x) = (1-p)+pe^-lamdba ; x=0
= [p(e^-lambda)lambda^x]/x! ; x = 1, 2, ...
= 0 ; otherwise

Homework Equations



show that f(x) is a valid probability function

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I am supposed to integrate [p(e^-lambda)lambda^x]/x! from 0 to infinity...
or is it 1 - infinity? I'm very confused. Could someone help me solve this?


Thanks

Sorry if my notations are wrong, I'm new.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, I've now worked it out. I used the summation instead of the integral. i hope this is correct.

thanks
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top