A Value at Risk, Conditional Value at Risk, expected shortfall

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter monsmatglad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditional Value
monsmatglad
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I am working on Value at Risk and expected shortfall/conditional Value at Risk.The formula I have is this:
0

What I do not understand is numerator of the second part. If for example I want to look at an expected shortfall when p=0.01 (ignoring the average and the standard deviation). what value will the numerator have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see a formula
 
magoo said:
I don't see a formula
0
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top