Value of Fourier Series from Two Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a specific series representation involving the sum of reciprocals of squares plus a constant, specifically the equation ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = \frac{\pi}{2b}\coth b\pi - \frac{1}{2b^2}##. Participants are examining two equations related to exponential functions and their applicability in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of setting ##\theta = \pi## in the first equation to derive the series. There is a discussion about the applicability of the provided equations and the potential restrictions on the variable ##b##. Some participants question the validity of both equations being correct simultaneously and consider the implications of choosing ##b = 0##.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the equations and their applicability. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the problem, while others are still exploring the implications of their choices and the conditions under which the equations hold.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a warning in the exercise about being careful with the applicability of the equations, suggesting that certain conditions or assumptions may need to be clarified. The discussion also touches on the behavior of the equations as ##b## approaches zero, indicating potential divergence issues.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


Derive
##\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = \frac{\pi}{2b}\coth b\pi - \frac{1}{2b^2}##

from either
##e^{b\theta} = \frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi} \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{in\theta}}{b-in}##
for ##0 < \theta < 2\pi##.

or
##e^{b\theta} = \frac{\sinh b\pi}{\pi}\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{b-in}e^{in\theta}##
for ##-\pi < \theta < \pi##.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


To get the series to be from ##1\to \infty## it seems a good idea to set ##\theta=\pi## which means we have to use the first equation. We get
##e^{b\pi } = \frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi}\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{in\pi}}{b-in} =\frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi} \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\cos (n\pi)(b+in)}{b^2+n^2} ##
from that all ##\sin n\pi = 0 \; \forall n \in Z##. Moving thing around and realising that ##\cos (n\pi) = (-1)^n## we get
##\frac{2\pi e^{b\pi }}{e^{2\pi b}-1} = \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n(b+in)}{b^2+n^2} = b\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{b^2+n^2}##
since the terms with ##in## all cancel our and are zero for ##n=0##.

We realize that every term with ##n## is equal to the term with ##-n## and we get
##\frac{2\pi e^{b\pi }}{e^{2\pi b}-1} =\frac{1}{b}+ 2b\sum_1^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2}##
where we get ##\frac{1}{b}## from ##n=0##. The sum of the series is then
##\sum_1^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = \frac{\pi e^{b\pi }}{b(e^{2\pi b}-1)}-\frac{1}{2b^2}##
I can't get this to contain
##\coth b\pi = \frac{e^{b\pi}+e^{-b\pi}}{e^{b\pi}-e^{-b\pi}}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you say the relevant equations are not applicable?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Dr. Courtney said:
How can you say the relevant equations are not applicable?
They're not? The exercise give a warning "be careful" that may allude to that they or one of them may not be applicable. I thought since choosing ##\theta = \pi## seemed like a good idea to me and since ##0 < \pi < 2\pi## the first equation should be applicable?

Edit: I guess you meant why i wrote N/A. I just put them in the formulation of the exercise since they were that way in the book. I could've put them there instead ofcouse.
 
Last edited:
Incand said:
$$e^{b\theta} = \frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi} \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{in\theta}}{b-in}$$ for ##0 < \theta < 2\pi## or
$$e^{b\theta} = \frac{\sinh b\pi}{\pi}\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{b-in}e^{in\theta}$$ for ##-\pi < \theta < \pi##.
I don't see how both of these can be right because
$$\frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi} = \frac{e^{\pi b}(e^{\pi b}-e^{-\pi b})}{2\pi} = \frac{e^{\pi b}}{\pi} \sinh \pi b,$$ so for ##0 < \theta < \pi##, you'd have
$$e^{\pi b}\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{in\theta}}{b-in} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (-1)^n\frac{e^{in\theta}}{b-in}$$ Maybe that's true, but it doesn't look right to me. Consider the case when ##b=0##, for instance.

To get the series to be from ##1\to \infty##, it seems a good idea to set ##\theta=\pi##, which means we have to use the first equation. We get
$$e^{b\pi } = \frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi}\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{in\pi}}{b-in} =\frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi} \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\cos (n\pi)(b+in)}{b^2+n^2}$$
from that all ##\sin n\pi = 0 \; \forall n \in Z##. Moving thing around and realising that ##\cos (n\pi) = (-1)^n##, we get
$$\frac{2\pi e^{b\pi }}{e^{2\pi b}-1} = \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n(b+in)}{b^2+n^2} = b\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{b^2+n^2}$$ since the terms with ##in## all cancel our and are zero for ##n=0##.

We realize that every term with ##n## is equal to the term with ##-n##, and we get
$$\frac{2\pi e^{b\pi }}{e^{2\pi b}-1} =\frac{1}{b}+ 2b\sum_1^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2}$$ where we get ##\frac{1}{b}## from ##n=0##.
You should have
$$\frac{2\pi e^{b\pi }}{e^{2\pi b}-1} =\frac{1}{b}+ 2b\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n^2+b^2}.$$ You changed the form of the summand when you dropped the alternating signs.

The sum of the series is then
$$\sum_1^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = \frac{\pi e^{b\pi }}{b(e^{2\pi b}-1)}-\frac{1}{2b^2}.$$ I can't get this to contain ##\coth b\pi = \frac{e^{b\pi}+e^{-b\pi}}{e^{b\pi}-e^{-b\pi}}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
vela said:
I don't see how both of these can be right because
$$\frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi} = \frac{e^{\pi b}(e^{\pi b}-e^{-\pi b})}{2\pi} = \frac{e^{\pi b}}{\pi} \sinh \pi b,$$ so for ##0 < \theta < \pi##, you'd have
$$e^{\pi b}\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{in\theta}}{b-in} = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (-1)^n\frac{e^{in\theta}}{b-in}$$ Maybe that's true, but it doesn't look right to me. Consider the case when ##b=0##, for instance.
I'm pretty sure they're both right. I checked the book that I wrote them correctly (Folland, Fourier analysis and it's applications). It doesn't say that b is restricted in anyway but if we choose ##b=0## in the first equation we end up with ##1 =0## so perhaps ##b \ne 0##. I think you end up with a special case when deriving the coefficients for ##b=0##. Something along the lines of ##c_n = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^\pi e^{inx}dx = \frac{-e^{-in\pi}+e^{in\pi}}{2in\pi} = \frac{1}{2\pi} \sin n\pi##. (complex sine function). So you get other ##c_n## when ##b = 0## but I only did this real quick so may be wrong. Actually thinking about this made me come up with the solution to the original problem, cheers!
vela said:
$$\frac{2\pi e^{b\pi }}{e^{2\pi b}-1} =\frac{1}{b}+ 2b\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n^2+b^2}.$$ You changed the form of the summand when you dropped the alternating signs.
Thanks! You(we) actually proved another execise in the book by mistake!

I think I got it now, posting the solution if anyone is interested. Since the functions are discontinuous I can't input ##0## or ##\pi## in the wrong equation to cancel our the alternatiing ##(-1)^n## and I have to use the convergence theorem:
If ##f## is ##2\pi##-periodic and piecewise smooth we have (limit of partial sum)
##\lim_{N \to \infty} S_N^f (\theta ) = \frac{1}{2} \left[ f(\theta - ) + f(\theta +) \right]##
So If we pick ##\theta = 0## in the first equation we end up with
##\frac{e^{b2\pi}+e^{0}}{2} = \frac{e^{2\pi b}-1}{2\pi } \sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{b+in}{b^2+n^2}##
Rearanging we get
##b\sum_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = \frac{4\pi (e^{\pi b}+1)}{e^{2\pi b}-1}##
And summing from ##1 \to \infty## instead we get
##\frac{1}{b} + 2b\sum_1^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = \frac{\pi (e^{2\pi b}+1)}{e^{2\pi b}-1}##
and we get
##\sum_1^\infty \frac{1}{n^2+b^2} = -\frac{1}{2b^2} + \frac{\pi (e^{2\pi b}+1)}{2b(e^{2\pi b}-1)} = -\frac{1}{2b^2} + \frac{\pi}{2b} \coth b\pi##
 
Incand said:
I'm pretty sure they're both right. I checked the book that I wrote them correctly (Folland, Fourier analysis and it's applications). It doesn't say that b is restricted in anyway but if we choose ##b=0## in the first equation we end up with ##1 =0## so perhaps ##b \ne 0##.
##b=0## was a poor choice because that would make ##\sinh \pi b=0##, so I effectively divided by 0. I suspect with the first one, you end up having to take a limit as ##b\to 0## to evaluate the righthand side. While ##\sinh \pi b \to 0##, the series probably diverges in such a way that the product is goes to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K