Vaporizing Black Holes: Does It Really Happen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter varsha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
Black holes can vaporize through Hawking radiation, losing mass until they completely evaporate, which occurs over an extremely long timescale, such as 10^63 years for a 3 solar mass black hole. The term "Msun" refers to the mass of the sun, typically used in scientific discussions. While Hawking radiation has not been observationally confirmed, there is substantial theoretical support for its existence, although some uncertainties remain regarding the final state of evaporating black holes. Discussions also highlight the need for a robust theory of quantum gravity to fully understand these processes. Overall, the concept of black holes evaporating is widely accepted, but ongoing research continues to explore the nuances and implications of this phenomenon.
varsha
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
does this mean they really 'stop'. vaporize means 'decrease rapidly and disappear'. i know that. but i just want to be sure. please tell me if a BH really vaporizes. oh,and can you tell me what this means---'A 3 Msun black hole would require about 1063(10 raised to 63) years to completely evaporate'. what does M stand for in Msun?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
varsha said:
does this mean they really 'stop'. vaporize means 'decrease rapidly and disappear'. i know that. but i just want to be sure. please tell me if a BH really vaporizes. oh,and can you tell me what this means---'A 3 Msun black hole would require about 1063(10 raised to 63) years to completely evaporate'. what does M stand for in Msun?
Black holes vaporize when they lose all their mass through hawking radiation. They 'evaporate' so to speak. As they get smaller, the evaporate faster.

M_{sun} stands for the mass of the sun, usually in kilograms. In place of the word sun there will sometimes be a circle with a dot in the center, means the same thing.
 
franznietzsche said:
Black holes vaporize when they lose all their mass through hawking radiation. They 'evaporate' so to speak. As they get smaller, the evaporate faster.
M_{sun} stands for the mass of the sun, usually in kilograms. In place of the word sun there will sometimes be a circle with a dot in the center, means the same thing.
thanks for that info!
 
Is this an absolutely for sure thing? Is there any possibility of error in this hypothesis/theory?
 
ubavontuba said:
Is this an absolutely for sure thing? Is there any possibility of error in this hypothesis/theory?

Hawking radiation from black holes has not be observationally confirmed, if that's what you're getting at. However, we have good reasons to think it's correct. Also, some folks think black holes will radiate until they reach the Planck mass, leaving behind a tiny relic. This is uncertain, though, and should depend on our theory of quantum gravity.
 
Space Tiger said:
This is uncertain, though, and should depend on our theory of quantum gravity.
Do we have one yet? And/or, where do I find the "most recent" developments? (links?)
 
Labguy said:
Do we have one yet? And/or, where do I find the "most recent" developments? (links?)

I suggest a perusing of the https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=66" forum. There are a lot of discussions and links on the topic. I'm afraid I know very little about the subject.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SpaceTiger said:
Hawking radiation from black holes has not be observationally confirmed, if that's what you're getting at. However, we have good reasons to think it's correct. Also, some folks think black holes will radiate until they reach the Planck mass, leaving behind a tiny relic. This is uncertain, though, and should depend on our theory of quantum gravity.

No, I'm not really getting at observational evidence (that's supposed to come when the http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/general/gen_info.htm" comes on line). I'm more inclined to read opinions on the soundness of the hypothesis itself. Is there room for error? Is this room significant? That is to say; if black holes exist, must they evaporate?

I've seen lots of information in support of the hypothesis, but little to refute it. It seems that in the interest of good science, scientists would seek plausible alternatives in order to better verify the hypothesis.

As I recall, Brain Greene had hypothesized that electrons might be nano black holes. Here's an http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Black+hole+electron&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&linktext=electron%20black%20hole" . According to my information though, this concept isn't taken very seriously.

Labguy said:
Do we have one yet (a quantum gravity theory)? And/or, where do I find the "most recent" developments? (links?)

Here's an http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...wiki/Quantum_gravity+"Quantum+gravity"&hl=en".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SpaceTiger said:
I suggest a perusing of the https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=66" forum. There are a lot of discussions and links on the topic. I'm afraid I know very little about the subject.
I'll go there (haven't yet) but I really don't want to have to read any more about Brian Greene and String Theory...
I have about everything he (Greene) has published and I wish I could get 15 cents on the dollar for what I spent for them.:cry:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top