Vaporizing Gasoline for Perfect Combustion Products

  • Thread starter Thread starter NintendoKD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gasoline
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the desire to efficiently vaporize gasoline at various temperatures and pressures to achieve optimal combustion, aiming for products of CO2 and H2O with near-perfect stoichiometry. The initial idea involves using specific heat and volume, possibly in a vacuum, to facilitate vaporization, likening the process to air being pushed through a bong. A participant references Smokey's Adiabatic engine, highlighting the importance of thermal and vacuum control, particularly the role of air spinning in a vortex chamber that mixes air and fuel effectively. This method is believed to prevent premature combustion and improve engine response by maintaining a consistent vacuum and utilizing a custom camshaft design. The discussion emphasizes the potential of using vapor fuel instead of liquid to enhance engine efficiency and performance, drawing parallels to innovative designs that achieve high fuel economy.
NintendoKD
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Nothing fancy, I just want to turn gasoline into a vapor at various temperatures and various pressures with relative ease. I was thinking using specific heat with specific volume, or possibly a vacuum, and "like a bong" push air through it to vaporize it. The purpose of this is to make it feasible to mix air and fuel to get closer to true combustion "products CO2+H2O" and near perfect stoichiometry.

thanks,

Kevin
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
NintendoKD said:
Nothing fancy, I just want to turn gasoline into a vapor at various temperatures and various pressures with relative ease. I was thinking using specific heat with specific volume, or possibly a vacuum, and "like a bong" push air through it to vaporize it. The purpose of this is to make it feasible to mix air and fuel to get closer to true combustion "products CO2+H2O" and near perfect stoichiometry.

thanks,

Kevin

Stoner flamethrower alert?

:rolleyes:
 
NintendoKD said:
Nothing fancy, I just want to turn gasoline into a vapor at various temperatures and various pressures with relative ease. I was thinking using specific heat with specific volume, or possibly a vacuum, and "like a bong" push air through it to vaporize it. The purpose of this is to make it feasible to mix air and fuel to get closer to true combustion "products CO2+H2O" and near perfect stoichiometry.

thanks,

Kevin

Hi Kevin,
Because of your comment about Smokey's Adibaic engine, I found the patent and in reading it, there was a lot of Thermal and Vaccuum control going on, but I think his key to success was in item 54 (not a part) rather an action, air spinning in a vortex chamber and working in conjunction with the compressor impeller (both in the same housing).

Smokey gave few details about this key area, "In particular, referring to Fig. 3, a circular flange 200 including a pluraity of apertures 202 and a centrally located nipple 204 is suitably fastened to the inlet 120 of the turbine chamber 108."

The comment about a plurality of apertures (in my thoughts) explains how air and fuel were diffused into a spinning/mixing action, as it entered the same chamber that has the compressing turbo impeller. This mass of air and fuel in a swirling motion might have a value of it's own, in addition to the turbo compression. Might explain his comments of low engine RPM no lag response.

Later
Ron
 
RonL said:
Hi Kevin,
Because of your comment about Smokey's Adibaic engine, I found the patent and in reading it, there was a lot of Thermal and Vaccuum control going on, but I think his key to success was in item 54 (not a part) rather an action, air spinning in a vortex chamber and working in conjunction with the compressor impeller (both in the same housing).

Smokey gave few details about this key area, "In particular, referring to Fig. 3, a circular flange 200 including a pluraity of apertures 202 and a centrally located nipple 204 is suitably fastened to the inlet 120 of the turbine chamber 108."

The comment about a plurality of apertures (in my thoughts) explains how air and fuel were diffused into a spinning/mixing action, as it entered the same chamber that has the compressing turbo impeller. This mass of air and fuel in a swirling motion might have a value of it's own, in addition to the turbo compression. Might explain his comments of low engine RPM no lag response.

Later
Ron

The reason for no lag, is because the vapor, was expanding, think, what happens to your gas container in the shed in the summer? The turbine served two actions, it exchanged heat, mixed/stratified/hemogenized, the air and fuel, preventing premature combustion, and also acted as a one way valve to prevent the pressure and any flashback. I surmise no standard turbo was used here, probably an early vnt or vgt design, that was tied into the throttle. vacuum is very important, the reason he was able to pull this off was a custom camshaft, with zero valve overlap, which gave full vacuum throughout the powerband, and prevented burnt valves as a result in lean combustion. The mixture expanded further in the cylinder and was combusted after TDC, contrary to popular belief, because some of the force generated was by the expanding gas to force the crankshaft around and because of the loss of power by running rich, more power was needed to turn the crankshaft. You are absolutely correct, instead of using the turbo as a compressor alone he used it also as a turbine action, where combustion occurred inside the chamber, not from compression and heat alone but from the electromagnetic energy released from the spark, remember he is running very lean, meaning littl fuel, which is why he can pull off 50+MPG. I want to use a similar design, however, I want to already be working with vapor fuel, not liquid.
 
Back
Top