Variance and 2 point function in perturbation theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the statistical correlation of perturbations and the quantum 2-point function in perturbation theory. Participants question whether these concepts are equivalent, particularly in the context of vacuum fluctuations being described as Gaussian. The Bunch-Davies initial condition is mentioned as a standard for normalized fields, raising inquiries about its Gaussian nature. There is a consensus that the topic is more relevant to cosmology than quantum physics, with suggestions to report the thread for reassignment. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding cosmological perturbations during the early universe.
karlzr
Messages
129
Reaction score
2
When we try to find the statistical correlation of some perturbation between two positions, we always calculate the quantum 2-point function. Are these two concepts really the same?
Also, people say vacuum fluctuation is gaussian. For normalized fields, we always use Bunch-Davies initial condition ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2k}}e^{-i k \tau}##. So in which sense do we say it is gaussian?
Thanks! Any reference would be appreciated!
 
Space news on Phys.org
It shouldn't have been moved to quantum physics. It is absolutely cosmology! Cosmological perturbations at very early times of the universe. I should have made it clear in the previous post.
 
Yes, I too agree that this should be moved back to cosmology.
 
I think you should try the "Report" button to get attention of somebody from the staff.
 
Still need help. Thanks!
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe'

Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
View full post »

Similar threads

2-point correlation functions for curvature perturbations
Replies
12
Views
5K
I Degenerated perturbation theory
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Understanding the dynamics of a perturbed quantum harmonic oscillator
Replies
3
Views
1K
Solutions for nonrelativistic-matter perturbations
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Calculating the variance of integrated Poisson noise on a defined quantity
Replies
36
Views
4K
I More doubts in perturbation theory
Replies
8
Views
1K
I How are good quantum numbers related to perturbation theory?
Replies
18
Views
3K
I Questions about bayronic acoustic oscillations
Replies
9
Views
3K
A Synchronous to Newtonian gauge
Replies
1
Views
947
Initial conditions for tensor perturbations
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top